Advertisement

Surgery Today

, Volume 28, Issue 7, pp 732–735 | Cite as

Treatment of primary varicose veins: An assessment of the combination of high saphenous ligation and sclerotherapy

  • Masahiko Ishikawa
  • Norio Morimoto
  • Tadahiro Sasajima
  • Yoshihiko Kubo
  • Tetsuya Nozaka
Original Articles

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the optimal treatment for minimizing the recurrence of varicose veins, and to assess the value of the combined treatment of high saphenous ligation and sclerotherapy. A combined total of 967 limbs in 660 patients with primary varicose veins were treated. The treatments comprised: sclerotherapy alone in 81 limbs, high saphenous ligation alone in 3 limbs, a combination of sclerotherapy and high sephenous ligation in 843 limbs, and a combination of sclerotherapy and ligation of incompetent perforating veins in 10 limbs. Recurrent varicose veins appeared from 3 months after the initial treatment in 61 (6.3%) limbs. Saphenous-type recurrence, being the presence of saphenofemoral incompetence (SFI) and/or saphenopopliteal incompetence (SPI), was found in 20 limbs, and further treatment was given. Segmental-type recurrence, being superficial varices without SFI or SPI, was found in 41 limbs, all of which were treated with further sclerotherapy alone. To minimize the recurrence rate of varicose veins, the presence or absence of SFI, SPI, and incompetent perforating veins must be confirmed prior to the initial treatment. It was concluded that the combination of high saphenous ligation and sclerotherapy is effective for patients with SFI and/or SPI, whereas sclerotherapy alone is better for patients without SFI or SPI.

Key Words

varicose veins saphenous ligation sclerotherapy recurrent varicose veins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Doran FSA, White M (1975) A clinical trial designed to discover if the primary treatment of varicose veins should be by Fegan's method or by an operation. Br J Surg 62:72–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trempe J (1991) Long-term result of sclerotherapy and surgical treatment of the varicose short saphenous vein. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 17:597–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tremblay J, Lewis EW, Allen PT (1985) Selecting a treatment for primary varicose veins. Can Med Assoc J 133:20–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einarsson E, Eklof B, Neglen P (1993) Sclerotherapy or surgery as treatment for varicose veins; a prospective randomized study. Phlebology 8:22–26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldman MP (1995) Sclerotherapy. Treatment of varicose and telangiectatic leg veins. Mosby-Year Book St. Louis, pp 354–364Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldman MP (1995) Sclerotherapy. Treatment of varicose and telangiectatic leg veins. Mosby-Year Book. St. Louis, pp 221–222Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hobbs JT (1974) Surgery and sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicose veins. Arch Surg 109:793–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bishop CCR, Fronek HS, Fronek A, Dilley RB, Bernstein EF (1991) Real-time color duplex scanning after sclerotherapy of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 14:505–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jakobsen BH (1979) The value of different forms of treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg 66:182–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neglen P, Einarsson E, Eklof B (1986) High tie with sclerotherapy for saphenous vein insufficiency. Phlebology 1:105–111Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarin S, Scurr JH, Smith PDC (1992) Assessment of stripping the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg 79:889–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Royle JP (1986) Recurrent varicose veins. World J Surg 10:944–953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McMullin GM, Smith PDC, Scurr JH (1991) Objective assesement of high ligation without stripping the long saphenous vein. Br J Surg 78:1139–1142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papadakis K, Christodoulou C, Christopoulos D, Hobbs J, Malouf GM, Grigg M, Irvine A, Nicolaides A (1989) Number and anatomical distribution of incompetent thigh perforating veins. Br J Surg 76:581–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Darke SG (1992) The morphology of recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Surg 6:512–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Starnes HF, Vallence R, Hamilton NH (1984) Recurrent varicose veins: a radiological approach to investigation. Clin Radiol 35:95–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mosquera DA, Manns RA, Duffield RGM (1995) Phlebography in the management of recurrent varicose veins. Phlebology 10:19–22Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitchell DC, Darke SG (1987) The assessment of primary varicose veins by Doppler ultrasound—the role of sapheno-popliteal incompetence and short saphenous systems in calf varicosities. Eur J Vasc Surg 1:113–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bradbury AW, Stonebridge PA, Callam MJ, Walker AJ, Allen PL, Beggs I, Ruckley CV (1994) Recurrent varicose veins: assessent of the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg 81:373–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang GJ, Adachi I, Duan Z, Zhang Q, Guo R, Tang L, Gong C, He S (1996) The accuracy of color Doppler flow imaging for the detection of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis in Chinese patients. Jpn J Surg 26:683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiko Ishikawa
    • 1
  • Norio Morimoto
    • 1
  • Tadahiro Sasajima
    • 2
  • Yoshihiko Kubo
    • 2
  • Tetsuya Nozaka
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKitami Central HospitalKitami-shi, HokkaidoJapan
  2. 2.First Department of SurgeryAsahikawa Medical CollegeAsahikawa-shi, HokkaidoJapan

Personalised recommendations