Abstract
Lift and power requirements for hovering flight of eight species of insects are studied by solving the Navier-Stokes equation numerically. The solution provides velocity and pressure fields, from which unsteady aerodynamic forces and moments are obtained. The inertial torque of wing mass are computed analytically. The wing length of the insects ranges from 2 mm (fruit fly) to 52mm (hawkmoth); Reynolds numbersRe (based on mean flapping speed and mean chord length) ranges from 75 to 3 850. The primary findings are shown in the following: (1) Either small (R=2mm,Re=75), medium (R≈10mm,Re≈500) or large (R≈50 mm,Re≈4000) insects mainly employ the same high-lift mechanism, delayed stall, to produce lift in hovering flight. The midstroke angle of attack needed to produce a mean lift equal to the insect weight is approximately in the range of 25° to 45°, which is approximately in agreement with observation. (2) For the small insect (fruit fly) and for the medium and large insects with relatively small wingbeat frequency (cranefly, ladybird and hawkmoth), the specific power ranges from 18 to 39 W·kg−1, the major part of the power is due to aerodynamic force, and the elastic storage of negatige work does not change the specific power greatly. However for medium and large insects with relatively large wingbeat frequency (hoverfly, dronefly, honey bee and bumble bee), the specific power ranges from 39 to 61 W·kg−1, the major part of the power is due to wing inertia, and the elastic storage of negative work can decrease the specific power by approximately 33%. (3) For the case of power being mainly contributed by aerodynamic force (fruit fly, cranefly, ladybird and hawkmoth), the specific power is proportional to the product of the wingbeat frequency, the stroke amplitude, the wing length and the drag-to-lift ratio. For the case of power being mainly contributed by wing inertia (hoverfly, dronefly, honey bee and bumble bee), the specific power (without elastic storage) is proportional to the product of the cubic of wingbeat frequency, the square of the stroke amplitude, the square of the wing length and the ratio of wing mass to insect mass.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dickinson MH, Götz KG. Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers.J Exp Biol, 1993, 174: 45–64
Ellington CP, van den Berg C, Willmott AP. Leading edge vortices in insect flight.Nature, 1996, 384: 626–630
Willmott AP, Ellington CP, Thomas AR. Flow visualization and unsteady aerodynamics in the flight of the hawkmoth, Manduca sexta.Trans R Soc Lond, 1997b, 352: 303–316
Usherwood JR, Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of revolving wings. I. Model hawkmoth wings.J Exp Biol, 2002, 205: 1547–1564
Usherwood JR, Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of revolving wings. II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail.J Exp Biol, 2002, 205: 1565–1576
Birch JM, Dickinson MH. Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings.Nature, 2001, 412: 729–733
Liu H, Ellington CP, Kawachi K, et al. A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering.J Exp Biol, 1998, 201: 461–477
Wang ZJ. Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering.Phys Rev Lett, 2000, 85: 2216–2219
Lan SL, Sun M. Aerodynamic of properties of a wing performing unsteady rotational motions at low Reynolds number.Acta Mech, 2001, 149: 135–147
Dickinson MH, Lehman FO, Sane SP. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight.Science, 1999, 284: 1954–1960
Sane SP, Dickinson MH. The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production.J Exp Biol, 2001, 204: 2607–2626
Sun M, Tang J. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion.J Exp Biol, 2002, 205: 55–70
Ramamurit R, Sandberg WC. A three-dimensional computational study of the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight.J Exp Biol, 2002, 205: 1507–1518
Birch JM, Dickinson MH. The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight.J Exp Biol, 2003, 206: 2257–2272
Vogel S. Flight in Drosophila. I. Flight performance of tethered flies.J Exp Biol, 1966, 44: 567–578
Weis-Fogh T. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanism for lift production.J Exp Biol, 1973, 59: 169–230
Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters.Phil Trans R Soc Lond, B, 1984, 305: 17–40
Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics.Phil Trans R Soc Lond, B, 1984, 305: 41–78
Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. IV. Aerodynamic mechanisms.Phil Trans R Soc Lond, B, 1984, 305: 79–113
Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements.Phil Trans R Soc Lond, B, 1984, 305: 145–181
Ennos AR. The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some Diptera.J Exp Biol, 1989, 142: 49–85
Dudley R, Ellington CP. Mechanics of forward flight in bumblebees. I. Kinematics and morphology.J Exp Biol, 1990a, 148: 19–52
Dudley R, Ellington CP. Mechanics of forward flight in bumblebees. II. Quasi-steady lift and power requirements.J Exp Biol, 1990b, 148: 53–88
Willmott AP, Ellington CP. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight.J Exp Biol, 1997, 200: 2705–2722
Willmott AP, Ellington CP. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.J Exp Biol, 1997b, 200: 2723–2745
Lehman FO, Dickinson HD. The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.J Exp Biol, 1997, 200: 1133–1143
Sun M, Tang J. Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis.J Exp Biol, 2002, 205: 2413–2427
Sun M, Wu JH. Lift generation and power requirements of fruit fly in forward flight with modeled wing motion.J Exp Biol, 2003, 206: 3065–3083
Zanker JM. The wing beat of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Kinematics.Phil Trans R Soc Lond, B, 1990, 327: 1–18
Rogers SE, Kwak D. Upwind differencing scheme for the time-accurate incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.AIAA J, 1990, 28: 253–262
Rogers SE, Kwak D, Kiris C. Steady and unsteady solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.AIAA J, 1991, 29: 603–610
Lan SL, Sun M. Aerodynamic interaction between two airfiols in unsteady motions.Acta Mech, 2001, 150: 39–51
Vogel S. Flight in Drosophila. II. Variations in stroke parameters and wing contour.J Exp Biol, 1967, 46: 383–392
Weis-Fogh T. Energetics of hovering flight in hummingbirds and in Drosophila.J Exp Biol, 1972, 56: 79–104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10232010)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mao, S., Gang, D. Lift and power requirements of hovering insect flight. Acta Mech Sinica 19, 458–469 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484580
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484580