Skip to main content
Log in

Art, consciousness and artificial life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the relationship of consciousness to artificial life set in the context of art. Artificial life is as much a part of our quest for self-definition as an instrument in the construction of reality. In exploring the technology of life we are exploring the possibilities of what we might become. In our hypermediated, telematic culture, the self acquires an essentially non-linear identity. Telepresence and virtual reality, the avatars of Net life, present us with a distributed, multiple identity which in turn is producing a radically new art. This embodies an ‘interstitial practice’ set within the domain of artificial life, and located at the intersections of cognitive science, bio-engineering, telematics and metaphysics. Can artists find in artificial life, nanotechnology, robotics and molecular engineering the means towards a re-materialization of art, after its postmodern, screen-based dematerialization? Just as ideas of the ‘immaterial’ have dominated art discourse for the last 15 years, so questions of emergent form, intelligent structures and artificial life are shaping a new discourse, from which art is moving off the screen and back into the material world. Will the real significance of art's re-materialization be at the level of mind? Will artificial life only gain cultural significance when it gives rise to artificial mind and the construction of consciousness?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ascott R (1995) Apparitional aesthetics. In: Leopold-Seder H (ed) Internationales Kompendium der Computer-kuenste '95. Oestereichister Rudfunk, Linz, pp 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ascott R (1995) The architecture of cyberception. In: Toy M (ed) Architects in cyberspace. Academy Editions, London, pp 38–41

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chalmers D (1996) The conscious mind. Oxford University Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Phil Rev 83:435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ascott R (1993) Zurueck zur (kuenstlichen) Natur. In: Kaiser G et al. (eds) Kultur und Technik im 21. Jahrhundert, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, pp 341–355

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark K (1953) Landscape into art. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berenson B (1897) The central Italian painters of the Renaissance. Putnam, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Langton CG (1989) Artificial life. In: Langton CG (ed) Artificial life Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, p 2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy Ascott.

About this article

Cite this article

Ascott, R. Art, consciousness and artificial life. Artif Life Robotics 3, 176–180 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481136

Key words

Navigation