Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison between sevoflurane and propofol when combined with continuous epidural blockade in adult patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The effects of sevoflurane and propofol, in combination with continuous epidural blockade, on blood pressure control and time of recovery from anesthesia were compared.

Methods. Adult patients were allocated to either a sevoflurane (n=54) or a propofol (n=64) group. Anesthesia was induced with either inhalation of 5% sevoflurane or intravenous administration of 2 mg·kg−1 propofol. After an injection of vecuronium, the trachea was intubated and anesthesia was maintained with continuous epidural blockade, air/oxygen, and sevoflurane or propofol. The systolic arterial pressure was maintained within ±30% of that obtained on the ward.

Results. The number of cases requiring a change in the dose of either anesthetics or vasoactive agents was not different between the groups. However, the arterial pressure and heart rate were more stable in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group (P<0.05). The length of time before tracheal extubation was shorter in the sevoflurane group (10.4±5.2 min, mean±SD) than the propofol group (15.0±11.2 min,P<0.05).

Conclusion. Propofol anesthesia, in combination with continuous epidural blockade, results in more stable intraoperative hemodynamics than sevoflurane anesthesia, but requries a longer recovery time and results in larger interindividual variability than sevoflurane anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Segawa H, Mori K, Kasai K, Fukata J, Nakao K (1996) The role of the phrenic nerves in stress response in upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 82:1215–1224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith I, Ding Y, White PF (1991) Comparison of sevoflurane-N2O and propofol-isoflurane-N2O. Anesthesiology 75:A344

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yamada K, Shingu K, Kimura H, Ikeda S, Tsushima K, Imanishi T, Murao K (1997) Circulatory and catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision during sevoflurane, isoflurane, or halothane anesthesia. J Anesth 11:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shingu K, Osawa M, Mori K (1993) Modification of the stress responses with anesthesia during gynecological surgery: comparisons of propofol, sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia (in Japanese). Anesth Resus 29:69–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fredman B, Michael HN, Smith I, Wang J, Klein K, White PF (1995) Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol. Anesth Analg 81:823–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jellish WS, Lien CA, Fontenot HJ, Hall R (1996) The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesth Analg 82:479–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wandel C, Neff S, Bohrer H, Browne A, Motosch J, Martin E (1995) Recovery characteristics following anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol in adults undergoing out-patient surgery. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 48:185–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grounds RM, Maxwell DL, Taylor MB, Aber V, Royston D (1987) Acute ventilatory changes during iv induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol in man. Br J Anaesth 59:1098–1102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes MA, Glass PSA, Jacobs JR (1992) Context-sensitive halftime in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology 76:334–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Tsushima, K., Shingu, K., Okuda, H. et al. A comparison between sevoflurane and propofol when combined with continuous epidural blockade in adult patients. J Anesth 12, 57–61 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480773

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480773

Key words

Navigation