Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 100–104 | Cite as

Simple pain relief score by observers (PRSO) for assessing chronic pain

  • Sumihisa Aida
  • Misao Tomita
  • Cheong Lee
  • Satoru Fukuda
  • Koki Shimoji
Original Articles


In 56 patients with severe chronic pain, pain relief was evaluated by observation of changes in activities of daily life (ADL), drug intake, and patients' mood. The degree of pain relief was scored on the basis of these evaluations by a pain clinic physician, a nurse, and a member of the patient's family. The resulting score was termed “pain relief score by observers” (PRSO). Subjective pain relief was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Although a significant correlation (rS=0.755,P<0.001) was demonstrated between the mean PRSO and VAS values, there was some dissociation between the two values in patients with underlying personal problems such as compensation lawsuits or job loss. The results suggest that an objective evaluation of pain relief is possible by PRSO alone without subjective assessment, and that PRSO can be used for patients with various types of pain. Combined assessment of pain relief by the VAS and PRSO methods may be useful to detect the influence of personal background factors in patients with chronic pain.

Key words

Pain relief score Observer ADL Drug intake Mood 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Melzack R, Torgerson WS (1971) On the language of pain. Anesthesiology 34:50–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melzack R (1975) The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melzack R, Katz J, Jeans ME (1985) The role of compensation in chronic pain: analysis using a new method of scoring the McGill pain questionnaire. Pain 23:101–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham C, Bond SS, Gerkovick MM, Cook MR (1980) Use of the McGill pain questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency. Pain 8:377–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet ii:1127–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joyce CRB, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, Mason RM (1975) Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Lur J Clin Pharmacol 8:415–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott J, Huskisson EC (1976) Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2:175–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ (1976) The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluation of pain. Anaesthesia 31:1191–1198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37:378–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC (1983) Development of the Wisconsin brief pain questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 17:197–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heft MW, Pareker SR (1984) An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale score for pain. Pain 19:153–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frank AJM, Moll JMH, Hort JF (1982) A comparison of three ways of measuring pain. Rheumatol Rehabil 21:211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicholson AN (1978) Visual analogue scales and drug effects in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 6:3–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keefe FJ (1982) Behavioral assessment and treatment of chronic pain: current status and directions. J Consult Clin Psychol 6:896–911Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, Foley KM, Gracely RH, Reading AE (1985) Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 22:1–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sternbach RA, Timmermans G (1975) Personality changes associated with reduction of pain. Pain 1:177–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boyle P, Parbrook GD (1977) The interrelation of personality and postoperative factors. Br J Anaesth 49:259–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumagai Y, Shimoji K, Honma T, Uchiyama S, Ishijima B, Hokari T, Fujioka H, Ohama E (1992) Problems related to dorsal root entry zone lesions. Acta Neurochir 115:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Price DD, McGrath PA, Raffi A, Buckingham B (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17:45–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zalon ML (1993) Nurses' assessment of postoperative patients' pain. Pain 54:329–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malow RM, Olson RE (1981) Changes in pain perception after treatment for chronic pain. Pain 11:65–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JSA 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sumihisa Aida
    • 1
  • Misao Tomita
    • 1
  • Cheong Lee
    • 2
  • Satoru Fukuda
    • 1
  • Koki Shimoji
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyNiigata University School of MedicineNiigataJapan
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology, School of MedicineUniversity of UlsanSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations