Abstract
Prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) is a coagulation factor newly used as a molecular marker to monitor anticoagulant therapy in patients undergoing heart valve replacement. We evaluated the usefulness of F1+2 against that of prothrombin time (PT) reported as the internationalized normalized ratio (INR) in 93 patients undergoing mechanical heart valve implantation between August 1999 and July 2000. The study group consisted of 38 men and 55 women, with an average age of 61.1±11.2 years. The surgeries were 34 aortic replacements, 9 double valve replacements, and 50 mitral valve replacements. Warfarin doses were controlled based on PT-INR values at a target range of 1.5–2.5 F1+2 levels in the 0.4–1.2 nmol/l level were considered normal. No thromboembolism or bleeding complication occurred in any patient during the mean follow-up period of 12 months. The overall correction coefficient between F1+2 and PT-INR was 0.165 (P<0.001). A few specimens showed abnormally high levels of F1+2, even when PT-INR values were within the optimal range. The plasma levels of F1+2 that fell within normal range came from specimens with PT-INR values <1.50. The plasma levels of F1+2 that corresponded to PT-INR values of 1.50–2.50 fell just within the normal range, and the F1+2 levels corresponding to PT-INR values >2.50 were less than half of the lower limit of normal. Our analysis involving F1+2 confirmed PT-INR in the 1.5–2.5 range following mechanical heart valve implantation to be optimal. We found that using F1+2 to monitor individual response to anticoagulation therapy is useful when PT-INR values are difficult to obtain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Takahashi H, Wada K, Satoh N, Takakuwa E, Furuta R, Yoshino N, Shibata A. Evaluation of oral anticoagulant therapy by measuring plasma prothrombin fragment 1+2. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1993;4:435–439
Pelzer H, Schwarz A, Stüber W. Determination of human prothrombin activation fragment 1+2 in plasma with an antibody against a synthetic peptide. Thromb Haemost 1991;65:153–159
Li Z, Wu J, Mammen EF. Prothrombin fragment F1+2 and oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Res 1994;75:601–607
Koefoed BG, Feddersen C, Gullov AL, Petersen P. Effect of fixed minidose warfarin, conventional dose warfarin and aspirin on INR and prothrombin fragment 1+2 in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 1997;77:845–848
Nakamura K, Toyohira H, Kariyazono H, Yamada K, Moriyama Y, Taira A. Relationship between changes in F1+2 and TAT levels and blood coagulation early after prosthetic valve replacement. Thromb Res 1997;86:161–171
Tientadakul P, Opartkiattikul N, Sangtawesin W, Sakiyalak P. Effect of different oral anticoagulant intensities on prothrombin fragment 1+2 in Thai patints with mechanical heart valve prostheses. J Med Assoc Thai 1997;80:81–86
Kistler JP, Singer DE, Millenson MM, Bauer KA, Gress DR Barzegar S, Hughes RA, Sheehan MA, Maraventano SW, Oertel LB, Bernard R, Rosenberg RD. Effect of low-intensity warfarin anticoagulation on level of activity of the hemostatic system in patients with atrial fibrillation. BAATAF Investigators. Stroke 1993;24:1360–1365
Tripodi A, Cattaneo M, Molteni A, Cesana BM, Mannucci PM. Changes of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) as a function of increasing intensity of oral anticoagulation—considerations on the suitability of F1+2 to monitor oral anticoagulant treatment. Thromb Haemost 1998;79:571–573
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okada, Y., Mori, T., Asano, M. et al. Use of prothrombin fragment 1+2 for evaluating anticoagulant therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. J Artif Organs 4, 295–297 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480020
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480020