Skip to main content
Log in

Early results with the Carbo-seal composite valve conduit for aortic root replacement: Comparison with the St. Jude Medical/Hemashield composite graft

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Carbo-seal (C-S) composite valve conduit incorporates the CarboMedics mechanical prosthetic aortic valve in a gelatin-impregnated, twill-woven Gelweave tube graft. We evaluated the early results of the C-S composite graft in patients undergoing elective aortic root replacement. Five aortic root replacements with the C-S were compared with nine similar surgeries with St. Jude Medical/Hemashield (S-H) composite grafts, which were assembled during surgery. Both the Gelweave and the Hemashield graft fabrics are relatively thin and soft, allowing improved needle passage and surgical manipulation. No device-related complication was observed in the C-S group, although one low-output syndrome due to poor cardiac protection was found. In the S-H group, a non-infectious fever and a pleural effusion were observed. Body temperatures in both groups recovered to less than 37°C within 3 days after operation. The two groups demonstrated similar time courses in CRP, white blood cell count, red blood cell count, and LDH and no statistically significant intergroup differences. In terms of valve function (peak velocity and pressure gradient were determined by Doppler echo cardiography), both types of valves have remained within normal range through the last routine examination. Graft dilation also remained within an acceptable range at 6 months after operation, with no significant intergroup differences. In conclusion, the initial results indicated that the C-S composite valve conduit is a reliable device for use in aortic root replacement and may be considered comparable to the S-H. A longer follow-up in a larger patient population is necessary to confirm this positive early result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bentall HH, DeBono AA. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax 1968;23:338–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller DC, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Reitz BA, Rossiter SJ, Shumway NE. Concomitant resection of ascending aortic aneurysm and replacement of the aortic valve: operative and long-term results with “conventional” techniques in ninety patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;79:388–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lytle BW, Mahfood SS, Cosgrove DM, Loop FD. Replacement of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:651–658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis CTP, Cooley DA, Murphy MC, Talledo O, Vega D. Surgical repair of aortic root aneurysms in 280 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:38–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Perrillo JB. Sixteen year experience with aortic valve. Ann Surg 1991;214:308–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Girardi LN, Talwalkar NG, Coselli JS. Aortic root replacement: results using the St. Jude Medical/Hemashield composite graft. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1032–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giudoin R, Marceau D, Rao TJ, King M, Merhi Y, Rey P, Martin L, Duval M. In vitro and in vivo characterization of an impervious polyester arterial prosthetic, the Gelseal Tiaxial® graft. Biomaterials 1987;8:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Drury J, Ashton TR, Cunnigham JD, Maini R, Pollock JG. Experimental and clinical experience with a gelatin impregnated Dacron prosthesis. Ann Vasc Surg 1987;5:542–547

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kouchoukos NT, Marshall WG, Wedige-Stecher TA. Eleven year experience with composite graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:691–705

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cabrol C, Pavie A, Gandjbakhch I, Gandjibakhch I, Villemot JP, Guiraudon G, Laughlin L, Etievent P, Cham B. Complete replacement of the ascending aorta with reimplantation of coronary arteries. New surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;81:309–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tolan M, Wells F, Kendall S, Large S, Wallwork J. Clinical experience with a collagen impregnated woven Dacron graft. J Cardiovasc Surg Torino 1995;36:323–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ukpabi P, Marois Y, King M, DengX, Martin L, Laroche G, Douville Y, Guidoin R. The Gelweave polyester arterial prosthesis. Can J Surg 1995;38:322–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shoji Y, Itoh T, Hata M, Sadahiro M, Nibori K, Miura M, Uchida N, Ohmi M, Tabayashi K, Mohri H. Early and late clinical results of thoracic aortic replacement using gelatin-impregnated woven Dacron graft. Jpn J Vasc Surg 1997;6:417–422

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scott SM, Gaddy LR, Sahmel R, Hoffman H. A collagen coated vascular prosthesis. J Cardvasc Surg 1987;28:498–504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Norgen L, Berggren U, Parsson H, Ribbe E, Thorne J. How does Hemashield alter surgical technique? Clinical results in aortic reconstructions. Angio Arch 1985;9:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ando M, Adachi S, Nakaya M, Kawashima Y. Clinical experience with a gelatin impregnated Dacron prosthesis in the surgical treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysm. 1993;22:455–458

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yamada O, Kazui T, Kimura N, Tanaka T, Komatsu S. Clinical experience in replacement of the thoracic aorta with collagen-impregnated woven Dacron graft. Jpn J Artif Organs 1994;23:818–820

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ishikawa S, Ohtaki A, Takahashi T, Sato Y, Suzuki M, Koyano T, Morishita Y. Non-infective high fever after replacement of thoracic aorta using collagen-impregnated Dacron prosthesis. J Cardiovasc Surg Torino 1995;36:143–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aizaki M, Ishikawa S, Hamada Y, Tsuda K, Otaki A, Otani Y, Ichikawa H, Takahashi T, Satou Y, Morishita Y. Clinical experience of a knitted Dacton prosthesis impregnated with gelatin. Jpn J Artif Organs 1994;23:1000–1002

    Google Scholar 

  20. Norgren L, Holtas S, Persson G, Ribbe E, Saxne T, Thorne J. Immune response to collagen impregnated Dacron double velour grafts for aortic and aorto-femoral reconstructions. Eng J Vasc Surg 1990;4:379–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto K, Noishiki Y, Mo M, Kondo J, Matsumoto A. Unusual inflammatory responses around a collagen-impregnated vascular prosthesis. Artif Organs 1993;17:1010–1016

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nunn DB, Carter MM, Donohue MT, Hudgins PC. Postoperative dilation of knitted Dacron bifurcation graft. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Magee HR, Teague CA. Late rupture of knitted velour Dacron arterial prosthesis. Aust NZ J Surg 1988;58:549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Utoh J, Goto H, Hirata T, Hara M, Kitamura N. Dilatation of sealed Dacron vascular prostheses: a comparison of Gelseal and Hemashield. J Cardiovasc Surg Torino 1998;39:179–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Igari T, Iwaya F, Hoshino S. Postoperative alteration in the size of Dacron vascular prostheses implanted in the infrarenal abdominal aorta. Surg Today 1995;25:605–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsutumi Y, Ohashi H, Kawai T, Ueyama K, Ohnaka M. Postoperative evaluation of presealed vascular prostheses in surgical treatment of the thoracic aorta. Kyobu-Geka 1997;50:358–361

    Google Scholar 

  27. Campell A, Sauter J, Koyanagi H. Development of an ascending aortic valve conduit. Jpn J Artif Organs 1997;21:625–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fiane AE, Geiran OR, Svennevig JL. Up to eight years' follow-up of 997 patients receiving the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve. Ann Thoracic Surg 1998;66:443–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Gutierrez-Garcia F, Morales C, Nistal F, Revuelta JM. The CarboMedics valve: experience with 1049 implants. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:137–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Arom KV, Nicoloff DM, Kersten TE, Northrup WF III, Lindsay WG, Emery RW. Ten years' experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:831–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Czer LS, Chaux A, Matloff JM, DeRobertis MA, Nessim SA, Scarlata D, Khan SS, Kass RM, Tsai TP, Blanche C, Gray RJ. Ten year experience with the St. Jude Medical valve for primary valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:44–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernandez J, Laub GW, Adkins MS, Anderson WA, Chen C, Bailey BM, Nealon LM, McGrath LB. Early and late phase events after valve replacement with St. Jude Medical prosthesis in 1200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:394–407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Aoyagi S, Oryoji A, Nishi Y, Tanaka K, Kosuga K, Oishi K. Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:1021–1029

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eiki Tayama MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tayama, E., Akashi, H., Ishihara, K. et al. Early results with the Carbo-seal composite valve conduit for aortic root replacement: Comparison with the St. Jude Medical/Hemashield composite graft. J Artif Organs 3, 120–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479978

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479978

Key words

Navigation