Summary
The probability of misclassification inherent in the use of a linear discriminant function is not necessarily known to the experimenter using such a function. Various estimators calculated from the sample used to generate the sample discriminant function have been proposed. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and to compare several of these estimators by using unconditional mean square error as the criterion. Discussion is restricted to the case where each of the distributions is univariate normal with common variance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T. W. (1951). Classification by multivariate analysis,Psychometrika,16, 31–50.
Geisser, S. (1967). Estimation associated with linear discriminants,Ann. Math. Statist.,38, 807–817.
Hill, M. (1966). Allocation rules and their error rates,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,28, 1–32.
John, S. (1961). Errors in discrimination,Ann. Math. Statist. 32, 1125–1144.
Lachenbruch, P. A. and Mickey, M. R. (1968). Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis,Technometrics,10, 1–11.
Okamoto, M. (1963). An asymptotic expansion for the distribution of the linear discriminant function,Ann. Math. Statist.,34, 1286–1301.
Sedransk, N. (1969). Contributions to discriminant analysis,Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University.
Smith, C. A. B. (1947). Some examples of discrimination,Ann. Eugenics,13, 272–282.
Sorum, M. J. (1968). Estimating the probability of misclassification,Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Minnesota.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is partially based on the Ph.D. thesis of N. Sedransk [7] at Iowa State University.
About this article
Cite this article
Sedransk, N., Okamoto, M. Estimation of the probabilities of misclassification for a linear discriminant function in the univariate normal case. Ann Inst Stat Math 23, 419–435 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479241
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479241