Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of pore size distribution by suction prosimetry

  • Published:
Matériaux et Construction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theory and practice of suction porosimetry methods (suction plate, pressure membrane and centrifuge) are reviewed together with related methods based on the rate of penetration of wetting liquids, and on static and dynamic fluid/fluid displacement measurements.

Résumé

La porosimétrie par succion repose sur la mesure de la dépression capillaire que suscite un liquide mouillant retenu dans un milieu poreux. C’est donc une méthode complémentaire à celle de la porosimétrie par pression (par ex. pénétration de mercure) où l’on opère avec des liquides mouillants. On expose la théorie et la pratique des méthodes par succion, entre autres les méthodes de la plaque, de la membrane et de la centrifugation. Un groupe de méthodes voisines découle de la vitesse de pénétration des liquides mouillants sous l’action des forces capillaires (par ex. la méthode d’Astbury), et de l’observation dans les conditions statique et dynamique des mouvements gaz/liquide et liquide/liquide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alviset L., Liger C.La mesure de la répartition des capillaires dans un tesson de terre cuite et les applications que l’on peut en faire. Proc. VI, Int. Ceram Congr., Wiesbaden, 1958, 401.

  2. Astbury N.F.A model for connected porosity in ceramic bodies. Trans Brit Ceram, Soc., 67, Aug. 1968, 319.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Astbury N.F.Neues Verfahren zur Untersuchung der Poren-Grössen-verteilung. Ber Deuts Keram Ges, 49 (1972)/2, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Boer J.H.The structure and properties of porous materials, Everett & Stone (Editors). Tenth Colston Symp., Bristol 1958, Butterworth, London, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bomberg M.Water flow through porous materials. Part I:Methods of water transport measurements. Report 19, Division of Build. Techn. Lund Inst. of Techn. 1971.

  6. Bomberg M.—Part II:Relative suction model. Report 20, Div. of Build. Techn Lund Inst. of Techn., 1971.

  7. Bomberg M.—Part III:Applications of the relative suction model. Report 21, Div. of Build. Techn. Lund Inst. of Techn., 1972.

  8. Clements J.F., Vyse, J.A comparison of methods of measuring pore-size distribution in refractories. Trans Brit Ceram Soc, 67 (1968), 285.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Croney D., Coleman J.D., Bridge P.M.The suction of moisture held in soil and other porous materials. Road Res. Techn. Paper No. 24, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dullien F.A.L., Batra V.K.Determination of the structure of porous media. Ind. Eng. Chem., 62 (1970), 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erbe F.Die Bestimmung der Porenverteilung nach ihrer Grösse in Filtern und Ultrafiltern. Kolloid Z 63 (1933), 277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fagerlund G.Frost resistance of porous and brittle materials in relation to their structure-theory and experiments. Report 30, Div. of Build Techn. at Lund Inst. of Techn., 1972 (in Swedish).

  13. Gèmesi J.Untersuchung der Kapillarerscheinungen in Beton mit Zerstörungsfreien Methoden. Wissensch Zeitschr Hochsch f Bauwesen, Leipzig H3 (1969), 175.

  14. Grabar P., Nikitine S.Sur le diamètre des pores des membranes en collodion utilisées en ultrafiltration. J. Chim. Phys. 33 (1936), 721.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen T.C.Drying shrinkage of concrete due to capillary action. Techn. Rep. No. 1. Techn. Univ. of Denmark, Dept Civil Eng., 1967.

  16. Ksenshek O.S., Kalinovskii E.A., Petrova S.A., Litvinova V.J.Centrifugal method for finding pore-size distribution in porous media. Russian J. of Phys. Chem., 41 (1967), 856.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luikow A.V.Heat and mass transfer in capillary porous bodies. Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manegold E., Komagata S., Albrecht E.Über Kapillarsysteme XIX. Kolloid Zeitschr., 93 (1940), 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Minnen J., Vos B.H.Distribution and transport of water in porous materials. Report No. II-8 TNO, Delft, 1965.

  20. Ohnemüller W.Die Bestimmung der Frostemp-findlichkeit poröser keramischer Werkstoffe mit Hilfe physikalischen Messgrössen. Diss Fakultät für Bergbau und Hüttenwesen der Bergakademie Clausthal, 1960.

  21. Penner E.Suction and its use as measure of moisture contents and potentials in porous materials. Humidity & Moisture, Vol. 4, p. 245. Reinhold, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schofield R.K.The pF of water in soil. Trans. 3rd Int. Congr. of Soil Sci. No. 2, Oxford, 1935.

  23. Schwiete H.E., Ludwig U.—Über die Bestimmung der offenen Porosität im Zementstein. Tonind Ztg., 90, 1966, 562.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sewell E.C., Watson E.W.Hysteresis in the moisture characteristics of ideal bodies. Bull Rilem, 29, 1965, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Timofeev D.P.The mechanism of transport of matter in porous sorbents. Russ. Chem. Rev., 29 (1960), 180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vos B.H., Tamnes E.Moisture and moisture transfer in porous materials. Report No. B 1-69-96 TNO, Delft, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Žagar L.Ermittlung der Grössenverteilung von Poren in Feuernfesten Baustoffen. Archiv f. das Eisenhüttenwesen, 26 (1955)/H 9/, 561.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Žagar L.Ermittlung der Grössenverteilung von Poren in Feuernfesten Baustoffen und Glasnutschen. Teil II, Archiv. f. das. Eisenhüttenwesen, 27 (1956)/H 10 657.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Žagar L.Über die Textur von Feuernfesten Baust-offen. Ber Deut Keram Ges. 35 (1958), 294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagerlund, G. Determination of pore size distribution by suction prosimetry. Mat. Constr. 6, 191–201 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479033

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479033

Keywords

Navigation