Advertisement

The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 285–307 | Cite as

Molecular set theory: A mathematical representation for chemical reaction mechanisms

  • Anthony F. Bartholomay
Article

Abstract

The present investigation is part of a program aimed at examining the mathematical basis of reaction rate theory (Bartholomay,Bull. Math. Biophys. 20, 1958) from the point of view of individual molecular events. Certain inconsistencies resulting from the classical procedure of using stoichiometric “chemical equations” to represent the kinds of mechanisms involved are pointed out and remedies are suggested by the introduction of set-theoretic notation within the framework of a so-calledMolecular Set Theory. It is concluded that whereas ordinary algebra is a suitable basis for stoichiometry, in discussing mechanisms of chemical reactions,molecular set theory is more appropriate. This is a theory of material transformations which is patterned afterabstract set theory: the individual molecules of a chemical species and chemical transformations from one species to another correspond to the abstract concepts of elements or points of a set and their mappings into other sets respectively. The new notions ofexact molecular sequences andequivalence classes of molecules arising from this study of chemical reactions may be of purely mathematical interest when referred back to the context of abstract set theory.

Keywords

Equivalence Class Deterministic Theory Unimolecular Reaction Unimolecular Decomposition Reaction Rate Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Bartholomay, A. F. 1957. “A Stochastic Approach to Chemical Reaction Kinetics.” S.D. Thesis, School of Public Health, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  2. — 1958. “Stochastic Models for Chemical Reactions: I. Theory of the Unimolecular Reaction Process.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 175–190.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. — 1959. “Stochastic Models for Chemical Reactions: II. The Unimolecular Rate Constant.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,21, 363–373.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, H. C., Fletcher, R. S. 1949. “Chemical Effects of Steric Strains. I. The Effect of Structure Upon the Hydrolysis of Tertiary Aliphatic Chlorides.”J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71, 1845–1854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartan, H., Eilenberg, S. 1956.Homological Algebra. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Frost, A. A., Pearson, R. G. 1953.Kinetics and Mechanism. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Hinshelwood, C. N. 1927. “Theory of Unimolecular Reactions”Proc. Roy. Soc. A 113, 230–233.Google Scholar
  8. Hurewicz, W. 1941. “On Duality Theorems” (Abst.).Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 47, 562.Google Scholar
  9. Kelley, J. L., Pitcher, E. 1947. “Homology Theory.”Ann. Mathematics 48, 682–709.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindemann, F. A. 1922. “Discussion on the Radiation Theory of Chemical Action.”Trans. Faraday Soc. 17, 598–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rashevsky, N. 1954. “Topology and Life: In Search of General Mathematical Principles in Biology and Sociology.”Bull. Math. Biophys. 16, 317–348.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. — 1955a. “Some Theorems in Topology and a Possible Biological Implication.”17, 111–126.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — 1955b. “Some Remarks on Topological Biology.”17, 207–218.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. — 1955c. “Life, Information Theory, and Topology.”17, 229–235.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. — 1956. “The Geometrization of Biology.”18, 31–56.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. — 1957. “A Note on the Geometrization of Biology.”19, 201–4.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. — 1958. “A Contribution to the Search of General Mathematical Principles in Biology.”20, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. — 1959. “A Set Theoretical Approach to Biology.”21, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosen, R. 1958a. “The Representation of Biological Systems from the Standpoint of the Theory of Categories.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. — 1958b. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems.”,20, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. — 1959. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems.”21, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schroedinger, E. 1945.What is Life? The Physical Aspects of The Living Cell. New York: The Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  23. Wacker, W. E. C. and Vallee, B. L. 1959. “Nucleic Acids and Metals I.”J. Biological Chemistry,234, 3257–3262.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Chicago 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony F. Bartholomay
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityBoston
  2. 2.The Biophysics Research Laboratory of the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Peter Bent Brigham HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations