The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 263–267 | Cite as

A contribution to the mathematical biology of automobile driving: II. Passing as a case of psychophysical discrimination

  • N. Rashevsky
Article

Abstract

The decision to pass or not to pass in view of an oncoming car is considered as a case of comparative judgment in which it is to be decided whether the time it will take to pass safely is greater or less than the time it will take to collide with the oncoming car. H. D. Landahl's well-known theory of psychophysical discrimination is used, and it is assumed that the “distracting stimuli” considered previously (Rashevsky, 1959,Bull. Math. Biophysics,21, 375–85) tend to increase the standard deviation of Landahl's fluctuation function. Effects of the “distracting stimuli” on the threshold of the neuroelements in Landahl's circuit are also considered. On this basis an expression is derived which gives the probability of a collision accident in passing as a function of the “distracting stimuli.”

Keywords

Mathematical Biology Biophysics Volume Comparative Judgment Automobile Driving Distract Stimulus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Landahl, H. D. 1938. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination.”Psychometrica,3, 107–125.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. — 1939. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination II.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,1, 159–76.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. — 1940. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination III.”,2, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Rashevsky, N. 1959a. “Some Remarks on the Mathematical Aspects of Automobile Driving.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,21, 299–308.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. — 1959b.Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. Revised Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. — 1959c. “Mathematical Biophysics of Automobile Driving.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,21, 375–85.Google Scholar
  7. — 1960a.Mathematical Biophysics, II. 3rd Ed. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. — 1960b. “Further Contributions to the Mathematical Biophysics of Automobile Driving.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,22, 257–262.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Chicago 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Rashevsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Committee on Mathematical BiologyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations