Abstract
The expressions of Wolfet al. (1951) and Renkin (1956) for the kinetics of artificial kidneys are generalized to include the effects of filtration. IfB is the bath volume,b the relevant volume of distribution,f the filtration rate,t the time, andA 0,B 0,b 0 representA, B, andb at timet=0, then the plasma concentrationA is given by
whereD f is a rate constant, andK(ft) is given by
Lettinga 0 denote the flow rate at the entrane to the dialysis tubing,f the net rate of filtration,P the permeability,S the surface area,V the volume of fluid in the dialysis tubing, andt c the circulation time of the fluid through the dialysis tubing, thenD f is given by
Whenf=0,D f reduces to the ordinary dialysance constant.
These corrections to the filtration-free case are small when considering an adult male body volume together with the parameters of present day artificial kidneys.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Black, M. W. 1959. “Clinical Guides for the Estimation of Water and Urea Removal during Hemodialysis with the Kolff Twin Coil Kidney.”Tr. Am. Soc. Artificial Internal Organs. 5, 50–57.
Maher, J. F., G. E. Schreiner, and J. Marc-Aurele. 1959. “Methodologic Problems Associated with in Vitro Measurements of Dialysance.”Tr. Am Soc. Artificial Internal Organs. 5, 120–28.
Renkin, E. M. 1956. “The Relation between Dialysance, Membrane Area, Permeability and Blood Flow in the Artificial Kidney.”Tr. Am. Soc. Artificial Internal Organs,2, 102–105.
Wolf, A. V., D. G. Remp, J. E. Kiley, and G. D. Currie. 1951. “Artificial Kidney Function: Kinetics of Hemodialysis.”J. Clin. Investigation,30, 1062–1070.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macey, R.I., Wolf, A.V. Kinetics of ultrafiltration hemodialysis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 22, 217–226 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478346
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478346