Advertisement

The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 169–177 | Cite as

Suggested experimental procedure for determining the satisfaction function of animals

  • Anatol Rapoport
  • Alfonso Shimbel
Article

Abstract

Some general experimental procedures are suggested to test a previously developed theory of motivation interactions which gives a quantitative description of factors in motivation. The experiments are devised with a view of varying simultaneously the “positive” and “negative” terms of a postulated satisfaction function which is supposed to depend on the subject's “effort” and “remuneration.” If the output of effort on the part of the subject reaches a steady state for a given set of conditions, this output is taken to be the optimum output under those conditions. In other words, it is supposed that the satisfaction function is “maximized.” From the equations describing the derivatives of the satisfaction function with respect to different variables, the “biological constants” of the individual can be computed and his behavior predicted under a variety of other conditions. In particular, on the basis of previous papers, it should be possible to predict the behavior of two “cooperating” and “sharing” individuals.

Keywords

Individual Animal Logarithmic Function Optimum Output Adjustment Time General Experimental Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Bayer, E., 1929. “Beiträge zur Zweikomponententheorie des Hungers,”Zeitschrift für Psychologie,112, 1–54.Google Scholar
  2. Elliott, M. H. 1929a. “The Effect of Appropriateness of Reward and of Complex Incentives on Maze Performance.”Univ. Calif. Publ. Psychol.,4, 91–98.Google Scholar
  3. Elliott, M. H. 1929b. “The Effect of Change of ‘Drive’ on Maze Performance.”Univ. Calif. Publ. Psychol.,4, 185–188.Google Scholar
  4. Nissen, H. W. 1930. “A Study of Maternal Behavior in the White Rat by Means of the Obstruction Method.”Jour. Genet. Psychol.,37, 377–393.Google Scholar
  5. Rapoport, A. 1947a. “Mathematical Theory of Motivation Interactions of Two Individuals: I.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,9, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rapoport, A. 1947b. “Mathematical Theory of Motivation Interactions of Two Individuals: II.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,9, 41–61.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rapoport, A. 1947c. “Forms of Output Distribution Between Two Individuals Motivated by a Satisfaction Function.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,9, 109–122.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Thurstone, L. L. 1931. “The Indifference Function.”Jour. Soc. Psychol.,2, 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tsai, L. S. 1932. “The Laws of Minimum Effort and Maximum Satisfaction in Animal Behavior.”Mon. Nat. Res. Inst. Psychol., Peiping, p. 49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The University of Chicago Press 1947

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anatol Rapoport
    • 1
  • Alfonso Shimbel
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations