Advertisement

The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 157–167 | Cite as

A neural mechanism for discrimination III: Visually perceived lengths and distances

  • Alston S. Householder
Article

Abstract

A previously discussed neural mechanism for the discrimination of intensities is here applied to the judgment of visual lengths and distances on the assumption that the “intensity” associated with the magnitude being perceived is the intensity of innervation of the appropriate eye muscles necessary for scanning and fixating. Comparison with experimental data is made in the case of the judgment of lengths.

Keywords

Neural Mechanism Rectus Muscle Mathematical Biophysics Peripheral Stimulus Weber Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Baird, J. W. 1903. “The influence of accommodation and convergence upon the perception of depth.”Am. J. Psychol.,14, 150–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, Harvey A. and Jessie B. Allen. 1906. “A study of certain relations of accommodation and convergence to the judgment of the third dimension.”Psychol. Rev.,13, 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chodin, A. 1877. “Ist das Weber-Fechnersche Gesetz auf das Augenmaass anwendbar?”Graefes Arch. für Ophth.,23, 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guilford, J. P. 1932. “A generalized psychophysical law.”Psychol, Rev.,39, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hecht, Selig. 1938. “La base chimique et structurale de la vision.”Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles,583. Paris: Hermann et Cie.Google Scholar
  6. Householder, A. S. 1939. “A neural mechanism for discrimination.”Psychometrika,4, 45–58.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Householder, A. S. 1940. “A neural mechanism for discrimination. II. Discrimination of weights.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,2, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kennard, Margaret A. 1939. “Alterations in response to visual stimuli following lesions of frontal lobe in monkeys.”Arch. Neur. and Psychiat.,41, 1153–1165.Google Scholar
  9. Mach, Ernst. 1861. “Über das Sehen von Lage und Winkeln durch die Bewegung des Auges.”Wien. Akad. Ber.,43, II, 215–224.Google Scholar
  10. Rashevsky, N. 1938 a.Mathematical Biophysics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Rashevsky, N. 1938b. “Contribution to the mathematical biophysics of visual perception with special reference to the theory of aesthetic values of geometrical patterns.”Psychometrika,3, 253–271.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rashevsky, N. 1940.Advances and applications of mathematical biology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Roelofs, C. O. 1935. “Die optische Lokalisation.”Arch. Augenheilk,109, 395–415.Google Scholar
  14. Woodworth, R. S. 1914. “Professor Cattell's psychophysical contributions.”Arch. Psychol.,30, 60–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Corporation 1940

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alston S. Householder
    • 1
  1. 1.The university of chicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations