Skip to main content
Log in

Outline of a unified approach to physics, biology and sociology

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theory of organismic sets, introduced by N. Rashevsky (Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics,29, 139–152, 1967;30, 163–174, 1968), is developed further. As has been pointed out, a society is a set of individuals plus the products of their activities, which result in their interactions. A multicellular organism is a set of cells plus the products of their activities, while a unicellular organism is a set of genes plus the products of their activities. It is now pointed out that a physical system is a set of elementary particles plus the product of their activities, such as transitions from one energy level to another. Therefore physical, biological and sociological phenomena can be considered from a unified set-theoretical point of view. The notion of a “world set” is introduced. It consists of the union of physical and of organismic sets. In physical sets the formation of different structure is governed preponderantly by analytical functions, which are special type of relations. In organismic sets, which represent biological organisms and societies, the formation of various structures is governed preponderantly by requirements that some relations, which are not functions, be satisfied. This is called the postulate of relational forces. Inasmuch as every function is a relation (F-relation) but not every relation is a function (Q-relation), it has been shown previously (Rashevsky,Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics,29, 643–648, 1967) that the physical forces are only a special kind of relational force and that, therefore, the postulate of relational forces applies equally to physics, biology and sociology. By developing the earlier theory of organismic sets, we deduce the following conclusions: 1) A cell in which the genes are completely specialized, as is implied by the “one gene—one enzyme” principle, cannot be formed spontaneously. 2) By introducing the notion of organismic sets of different orders so that the elements of an organismic set of ordern are themselves organismic sets of order (n−1), we prove that in multicellular organisms no cell can be specialized completely; it performs, in addition to its special functions, also a number of others performed by other cells. 3) A differentiated multicellular organism cannot form spontaneously. It can only develop from simpler, less differentiated organisms. The same holds about societies. Highly specialized contemporary societies cannot appear spontaneously; they gradually develop from primitive, non-specialized societies. 4) In a multicellular organism a specialization of a cell is practically irreversible. 5) Every organismic set of ordern>1, that is, a multicellular organism as well as a society, is mortal. Civilizations die, and others may come in their place. 6) Barring special inhibitory conditions, all organisms multiply. 7) In cells there must exist specially-regulatory genes besides the so-called structural genes. 8) In basically identically-built organisms, but which are built from different material (proteins), a substitution of a part of one organism for the homologous part of another impairs the normal functioning (protein specificity of different species). 9) Even unicellular organisms show sexual differentiation and polarization. 10) Symbiotic and parasitic phenomena are included in the theory of organismic sets. Finally some general speculations are made in regard to the possibility of discovering laws of physics by pure mathematical reasoning, something in which Einstein has expressed explicit faith. From the above theory, such a thing appears to be possible. Also the idea of Poincaré, that the laws of physics as we perceive them are largely due to our psychobiological structure, is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Arhenius, Swante. 1911aDas Weltall. Leipzig: A. Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1911b.Das Schicksal der Planetus. Leipzig: Akadem. Verl.-Ges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. T. 1957.Cells and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, G. H. 1962.Division of Labor in Cells. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H. U. and S. B. Barker. 1962.Basic Endocrinology. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, John E. and Dan H. Campbell. 1957.Principles of Immunology. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, F. J. 1958. “Innovations in Physics.”Scientific American (Sept.) pp. 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, A. 1949.Fundamental Theory. Cambridge: University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. 1934.Essays in Science. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob, F. 1961. “General Conclusions: Teleonomic Mechanisms in Cellular Metabolism.”Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology,26, 289–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J. Wollman, 1961.Sexuality and the Genetics of Bacteria. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauzman, W. 1957.Quantum Chemistry. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompaneyetz, A. S. 1962.Theoretical Physics. Dover.

  • Lwoff, André. 1965.Biological Order. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. 1961. “On the Regulation of Gene Activity.”Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology,26, 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oparin, A. I. 1957.The Origin of Life on the Earth. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri. 1920.Dernieres Pensées Paris: E. Flammarion.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rainich, Y. G. 1950.Mathematics of Relativity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1935. “The Biophysics of Space and Time.”Phil. of Sc.,2, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1947.Mathematical Theory of Human Relations. Bloomington, Indiana: The Principia Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1954. “Topology and Life: In Search of General Mathematical Principles in Biology and Sociology.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 317–348.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1956. “The Geometrization of Biology.” —Ibid.,18, 31–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1959.Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. Revised Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1960.Mathematical Biophysics. The Physico-Mathematical Foundations of Biology. Third and Revised Edition. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1961.Mathematical Principles in Biology and Their Applications Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1965. “The Representation of Organisms in Terms of Predicates.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,27, 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1966a. “Physics, Biology, and Sociology: A Reappraisal.” —Ibid.,28, 283–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1966b. “A Sociological Approach to Biology.” —Ibid.,28, 655–661.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1967a. “Organismic Sets: Outline of a General Theory of Biological and Social Organisms.” —Ibid.,29, 139–152.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1967b. “Organismic Sets and Biological Epimorphism.” —Ibid.,29, 389–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1967c. “Physics, Biology and Sociology: II. Suggestion for a Synthesis.” —Ibid.,29, 643–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1968a. “Organismic Sets: II. Some General Considerations.” —Ibid.,30, 163–174.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1968b. “Neurocybernetics as a Particular Case of General Regulatory Mechanisms in Biological and Social Organisms.”Concepts del' Age de la Science,3, 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Robert. 1958a. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958b. “The Representation of Biological Systems from the Standpoint of the Theory of Categories.” —Ibid.,20, 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. “A Quantum-Theoretical Approach to Genetic Problems.” —Ibid.,22, 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962. “Church's Thesis and Its Relation to the Concept of Realizability in Biology and Physics.” —Ibid.,24, 375–393.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. “Recent Developments in the Theory of Control and Regulation of Cellular Processes.”Internat. Rev. of Cytology,23, 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamm, I. 1965. “Sovremennoye Sostoyanye Fisiki Elementarnykh Chastitz.”Vestnik Akad. Nauk SSSR, April, 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopff, V. 1965. “Quantum Theory and Elementary Particles.”Science,149, 1182–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1968. “The Three Spectroscopies.”Sci. American,218 (May) 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. S. C. 1961.An Introduction to Elementary Particles. New York, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodjer, J. H. 1937.The Axiomatic Method in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Chen Ning. 1962.Elementary Particles. A Short History of Some Discoveries in Atomic Physics. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rashevsky, N. Outline of a unified approach to physics, biology and sociology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 31, 159–198 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478215

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478215

Keywords

Navigation