Abstract
The theory of organismic sets, introduced by N. Rashevsky (Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics,29, 139–152, 1967;30, 163–174, 1968), is developed further. As has been pointed out, a society is a set of individuals plus the products of their activities, which result in their interactions. A multicellular organism is a set of cells plus the products of their activities, while a unicellular organism is a set of genes plus the products of their activities. It is now pointed out that a physical system is a set of elementary particles plus the product of their activities, such as transitions from one energy level to another. Therefore physical, biological and sociological phenomena can be considered from a unified set-theoretical point of view. The notion of a “world set” is introduced. It consists of the union of physical and of organismic sets. In physical sets the formation of different structure is governed preponderantly by analytical functions, which are special type of relations. In organismic sets, which represent biological organisms and societies, the formation of various structures is governed preponderantly by requirements that some relations, which are not functions, be satisfied. This is called the postulate of relational forces. Inasmuch as every function is a relation (F-relation) but not every relation is a function (Q-relation), it has been shown previously (Rashevsky,Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics,29, 643–648, 1967) that the physical forces are only a special kind of relational force and that, therefore, the postulate of relational forces applies equally to physics, biology and sociology. By developing the earlier theory of organismic sets, we deduce the following conclusions: 1) A cell in which the genes are completely specialized, as is implied by the “one gene—one enzyme” principle, cannot be formed spontaneously. 2) By introducing the notion of organismic sets of different orders so that the elements of an organismic set of ordern are themselves organismic sets of order (n−1), we prove that in multicellular organisms no cell can be specialized completely; it performs, in addition to its special functions, also a number of others performed by other cells. 3) A differentiated multicellular organism cannot form spontaneously. It can only develop from simpler, less differentiated organisms. The same holds about societies. Highly specialized contemporary societies cannot appear spontaneously; they gradually develop from primitive, non-specialized societies. 4) In a multicellular organism a specialization of a cell is practically irreversible. 5) Every organismic set of ordern>1, that is, a multicellular organism as well as a society, is mortal. Civilizations die, and others may come in their place. 6) Barring special inhibitory conditions, all organisms multiply. 7) In cells there must exist specially-regulatory genes besides the so-called structural genes. 8) In basically identically-built organisms, but which are built from different material (proteins), a substitution of a part of one organism for the homologous part of another impairs the normal functioning (protein specificity of different species). 9) Even unicellular organisms show sexual differentiation and polarization. 10) Symbiotic and parasitic phenomena are included in the theory of organismic sets. Finally some general speculations are made in regard to the possibility of discovering laws of physics by pure mathematical reasoning, something in which Einstein has expressed explicit faith. From the above theory, such a thing appears to be possible. Also the idea of Poincaré, that the laws of physics as we perceive them are largely due to our psychobiological structure, is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Arhenius, Swante. 1911aDas Weltall. Leipzig: A. Kröner.
—. 1911b.Das Schicksal der Planetus. Leipzig: Akadem. Verl.-Ges.
Bonner, J. T. 1957.Cells and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bourne, G. H. 1962.Division of Labor in Cells. New York: Academic Press.
Brown, J. H. U. and S. B. Barker. 1962.Basic Endocrinology. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis and Co.
Cushing, John E. and Dan H. Campbell. 1957.Principles of Immunology. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Dyson, F. J. 1958. “Innovations in Physics.”Scientific American (Sept.) pp. 74–82.
Eddington, A. 1949.Fundamental Theory. Cambridge: University Press.
Einstein, A. 1934.Essays in Science. New York: Philosophical Library.
Jakob, F. 1961. “General Conclusions: Teleonomic Mechanisms in Cellular Metabolism.”Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology,26, 289–400.
— and J. Wollman, 1961.Sexuality and the Genetics of Bacteria. New York: Academic Press.
Kauzman, W. 1957.Quantum Chemistry. New York: Academic Press.
Kompaneyetz, A. S. 1962.Theoretical Physics. Dover.
Lwoff, André. 1965.Biological Order. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Monod, J. 1961. “On the Regulation of Gene Activity.”Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology,26, 193–209.
Oparin, A. I. 1957.The Origin of Life on the Earth. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
Poincaré, Henri. 1920.Dernieres Pensées Paris: E. Flammarion.
Rainich, Y. G. 1950.Mathematics of Relativity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Rashevsky, N. 1935. “The Biophysics of Space and Time.”Phil. of Sc.,2, 73–85.
— 1947.Mathematical Theory of Human Relations. Bloomington, Indiana: The Principia Press.
— 1954. “Topology and Life: In Search of General Mathematical Principles in Biology and Sociology.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 317–348.
— 1956. “The Geometrization of Biology.” —Ibid.,18, 31–56.
— 1959.Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. Revised Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
— 1960.Mathematical Biophysics. The Physico-Mathematical Foundations of Biology. Third and Revised Edition. New York: Dover Publications.
— 1961.Mathematical Principles in Biology and Their Applications Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher.
— 1965. “The Representation of Organisms in Terms of Predicates.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,27, 477–491.
— 1966a. “Physics, Biology, and Sociology: A Reappraisal.” —Ibid.,28, 283–308.
— 1966b. “A Sociological Approach to Biology.” —Ibid.,28, 655–661.
— 1967a. “Organismic Sets: Outline of a General Theory of Biological and Social Organisms.” —Ibid.,29, 139–152.
— 1967b. “Organismic Sets and Biological Epimorphism.” —Ibid.,29, 389–393.
— 1967c. “Physics, Biology and Sociology: II. Suggestion for a Synthesis.” —Ibid.,29, 643–648.
— 1968a. “Organismic Sets: II. Some General Considerations.” —Ibid.,30, 163–174.
— 1968b. “Neurocybernetics as a Particular Case of General Regulatory Mechanisms in Biological and Social Organisms.”Concepts del' Age de la Science,3, 243–258.
Rosen, Robert. 1958a. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 245–260.
—. 1958b. “The Representation of Biological Systems from the Standpoint of the Theory of Categories.” —Ibid.,20, 317–341.
—. 1960. “A Quantum-Theoretical Approach to Genetic Problems.” —Ibid.,22, 227–255.
—. 1962. “Church's Thesis and Its Relation to the Concept of Realizability in Biology and Physics.” —Ibid.,24, 375–393.
—. 1968. “Recent Developments in the Theory of Control and Regulation of Cellular Processes.”Internat. Rev. of Cytology,23, 25–28.
Tamm, I. 1965. “Sovremennoye Sostoyanye Fisiki Elementarnykh Chastitz.”Vestnik Akad. Nauk SSSR, April, 30–41.
Weisskopff, V. 1965. “Quantum Theory and Elementary Particles.”Science,149, 1182–1189.
— 1968. “The Three Spectroscopies.”Sci. American,218 (May) 15–29.
Williams, W. S. C. 1961.An Introduction to Elementary Particles. New York, London: Academic Press.
Woodjer, J. H. 1937.The Axiomatic Method in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, Chen Ning. 1962.Elementary Particles. A Short History of Some Discoveries in Atomic Physics. Princeton: University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rashevsky, N. Outline of a unified approach to physics, biology and sociology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 31, 159–198 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478215
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478215