Abstract
An abstract representation of biological systems from the standpoint of the theory of supercategories is presented. The relevance of such representations forG-relational biologies is suggested. In section A the basic concepts of our representation, that is class, system, supercategory and measure are introduced. Section B is concerned with the mathematical representation starting with some axioms and principles which are natural extensions of the current abstract representations in biology. Likewise, some extensions of the principle of adequate design are introduced in section C. Two theorems which present the connection between categories and supercategories are proved. Two other theorems concerning the dynamical behavior of biological and biophysical systems are derived on the basis of the previous considerations. Section D is devoted to a general study of oscillatory behavior in enzymic systems, some general quantitative relations being derived from our representation. Finally, the relevance of these results for a quantum theoretic approach to biology is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Bourbaki, N. 1958. “Théorie des Ensembles.” Paris: Hermann & Cie.
Chance, B., B. Hess and A. Betz. 1964. “DPNH Oscillations in a Cell-Free Extract of S. Carlbergensis.”Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,16, 2, 182–186.
Chance, B., A. Ghosh, J. J. Higgins and P. K. Maitra. 1964. “Cyclic and Oscillatory Responses of Metabolic Pathways Involving Chemical Feedback and Their Computer Representations.”Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,115, 1010–1024.
—, and T. Yoshioka. 1966. “Sustained Oscillations of Ionic Constituents of Mitochondria.”Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,117, 451–465.
Comorosan, S. and O. Platica. 1968a. “A Theoretical Model for the Control Mechanisms in Biochemical Reactions.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,30, 123–133.
—. 1968b. “A Quantum-Mechanical Hypothesis for the Mechanism of Enzyme Reactions.”Enzymologia,35, 117–130.
Ghosh, A. and B. Chance. 1964. “Oscillations of Glycolytic Intermediates in Yeast Cells.”Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,16, 2, 174–181.
Mitchell, B. 1965. “Theory of Categories.” New York: Academic Press.
Rashevsky, N. 1967a. “Organismic Sets: Outline of a General Theory of Biological and Social Organisms.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,29, 139–152.
— 1967b. “On Relations Between Sets: III.” —Ibid.,,29, 639–642.
— 1967c. “Physics, Biology and Sociology: II. Suggestions for a Synthesis.” —Ibid.,,29, 643–647.
Robinson, A. 1963. “Introduction to Model Theory and to the Metamathematics of Algebra.” Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Rosen, R. 1958a. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 245–260.
— 1958b. “The Representation of Biological Systems from the Standpoint of the Theory of Categories.” —Ibid.,,20, 317–342.
— 1959. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems II.” —Ibid.,,21, 109–127.
— 1961. “On the Role of Chemical Systems in the Microphysical Aspects of Primary Genetic Mechanisms.” —Ibid.,,23, 393–403.
Rosen, R. 1968a. “On Universal Dynamical Systems.” (Personal Communication.)
— 1968b. “On Analogous Systems.” —Ibid.,,30, 481–492.
Tanaka, Takehiko, Fumiaki Sue and Hiroko Morimura. 1967. “Feed-Forward Activation and Feed-Back Inhibition of Pyruvate Kinase Type L of Rat Liver.”Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,29, 444–449.
Vinuela, E., L. M. Salas, M. Salas and A. Sols. 1964. “Two Interconvertible Forms of Yeast Phosphofructokinase with Different Sensitivity to Endproduct Inhibition.”Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,15, 3, 243–249.
Wiener, N. 1961. “Cybernetics.” New York: The M.I.T. Press and John Wiley & Sons, eds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comorosan, S., Baianu, I. Abstract representations of biological systems in supercategories. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 31, 59–70 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478208
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478208