Abstract
A general solution of the formal nerve conduction problem is given. As illustrations of the general method, the capacitative single-factor and the non-capacitative Lapicque problems are solved. Comparisons between velocity formulae for capacitative and non-capacitative models indicate that previously determined non-capacitative velocities are considerably too high.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Blair, H. A. 1932. “Stimulation of nerve by electrical currents. I.”Jour Gen. Physiol.,15, 709–732.
Hill, A. V. 1936. “Excitation and accommodation in Nerve.”Proc. Roy. Soc.,119, 305–355.
Lapicque, L. 1926.L'Excitabilité en Fonction du Temps. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France.
Monnier, A. M. 1934.L'Excitation Électrique des Tissues. Paris: Hermann.
Offner, F., Weinberg, A. M., and Young, G. 1940. “Nerve conduction theory: Some mathematical consequences of Bernstein's model.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,2, 89–103.
Rashevsky, N. 1931. “On the theory of nervous conduction.”Jour. Gen. Physiol.,14, 517–528.
Rashevsky, N. 1938.Mathematical Biophysics. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
Rushton, W. A. H. 1937. “Initiation of the propagated disturbance.”Proc. Roy. Soc., B. 124, 210–243.
Umrath, K. 1928. “Ueber die Erregungsleitung bei sensitiven pflanzen.”Planta,5, 274–324.
Webster, A. G. 1933.Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics. New York: G. E. Stechert.
Weinberg, A. M. 1939. “Nerve conduction with distributed capacitance.”Jour. Appl. Phys.,10, 128–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinberg, A.M. On the formal theory of nerve conduction. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 2, 127–133 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478177
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478177