Medical and biological engineering

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 263–273 | Cite as

Mathematical model for investigating combined seatback—head restraint performance during rear-end impact

  • J. C. Fox
  • J. F. Williams
Article

Abstract

A mathematical model of the seated driver subjected to a rear-end impact is developed using a lumped parameter model which,inter alia, allows for the investigation of the effect of an elastic—perfectly plastic head restraint device on the overall motion of the head and torso. The most satisfactory seatback-head restraint combination is found to be a seatback having a high rotational stiffness with a viscous damping coefficient of near ‘critical’ value combined with an energy absorbing head restraint having e plastic collapse load of approximately 890 N. The model confirms recent results which indicate that tensing of neck musculature prior to impact reduces injury potential.

Keywords

Whiplash Head restraints Rear end collisions Impact Mathematical model 

Nomenclature

CF

constant collapse load of head restraint

DKS1

viscous damping coefficient of seatback

Dh

initial head offset

I1

moment of inertia of torso/seatback unit

I2

moment of inertia of head/neck unit

L1

distance between pivot point and centre of gravity of torso/seatback

L2

distance between pivot point and C7

L3

distance between C7 and centre of gravity of head

M1

mass of torso/seatback

M2

mass of head/neck

Qj

generalised forces

SKS1

stiffness of torso/seatback

SKS2

stiffness of neck

SKS3

stiffness of head restraint

SKS4

stiffness of chin stop

T

kinetic energy

V

potential energy

x

distance

\(\dot x\)

velocity

\(\ddot x\)

acceleration

â,000123,ĉ

unit vectors

kh

radius of gyration—head/neck

k t

radius of gyration—torso/seatback

td

duration of impact acceleration pulse

qi

generalised co-ordinates

θ

angular displacement of head relative to vertical

ϕ

angular displacement of seatback relative to vertical

Sommaire

Un modèle mathématique du conducteur assis subissant un choc à l'arrière est développé, en utilisant un modèle à paramètres localisés qui, entre autres, permet l'étude de l'effet d'un dispositif de maintien de la tête élastique et parfaitement plastique sur le mouvement global de la tête et du buste. La combinaison dossier/maintien-tête s'avère être un dossier ayant une grande rigidité rotationnelle avec un coefficient d'amortissement visqueux d'une valuer quasi-critique conugué avec un maintien-tête absorbant d'énergie dont l'effort d'effondrement plastique est environ 890 N. Le modèle confirme des résultats récents indiquant que le raidissement de la musculature du cou avant l'impact limite la blessure éventuelle.

Zusammenfassung

Unter Verwendung eines punktförmig verteilten Parametermodells wird ein mathematisches Modell des sitzenden Fahrers entwickelt, der einen Heckaufprall erleidet. Bei diesem Modell ist u.a. die Untersuchung der Wirkung einer elastischen, perfekt plastischen Kopfstütze auf die Gesamtbewegung von Kopf und Körper möglich. Es wurde festgestellt, daß die beste Kombination von Rückenlehne und Kopfstütze aus einer Rückelehne mit hoher Verdrehungssteifigkeit besteht, deren viskoser Dämpfkoeffizient fast den ‘kritischen’ Wert erreicht, verbunden mit einer kraftabsorbierenden Kopfstütze mit einer plastischen Knickbelastung von etwa 890 N. Das Modell bestätigt kürzlich erzielte Ergebnisse, die darauf schließen lassen, daß sich durch eine Spannung der Nackenmuskulatur vor dem Aufprall die Möglichkeit einer Verletzung mindert.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berton, R. J. (1968) Whiplash: tests of the influential variables. S.A.E. Paper No. 680080.Google Scholar
  2. Bowman, B. M. andRobbins, D. H. (1972) Parameter study of biomechanical quantities in analytical neck models. Proc. 16th Stapp Car Crash Conf., Detroit, U.S.A., 14–44.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, B. J. andGriffin, L. I. (1973) Analysis of the benefits derived from presently existing motor vehicle safety devices: a review of the literature. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Centre Research Report.Google Scholar
  4. Fox, J. C. (1974) The dynamics of occupant protection in automobile rear-end collisions. M.Eng.Sc. Thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Gurdjian, E. S., Lissner, H. R., Evans, F. G., Patrick, L. M. andHardy, W. G. (1961) Intracranial pressure and acceleration accompanying head impacts in human cadavers.Surg. Gyn. and Obst. 112, 185–190.Google Scholar
  6. Kihlberg, J. (1969) Flexion-torsion neck injury in rear impacts. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, C.A.L. Report No. VJ-2721-R-2, April.Google Scholar
  7. Mertz, H. J. andPatrick, L. M. (1967) Investigation of kinematics and kinetics of whiplash. Proc. 11th Stapp Car Crash Conf., 175–206.Google Scholar
  8. Mertz, H. J. andPatrick, L. M. (1971) Strength and response of the human neck. Proc. 15th Stapp Car Crash Conf., 207–255.Google Scholar
  9. McKenzie, J. A. andWilliams, J. F. (1971) The dynamic behaviour of the head and cervical spine during whiplash.J. Biomechanics 4, (6), 447–490.Google Scholar
  10. Nelson, P. G. B. (1974) Chairman; Royal Australian College of Surgeons' Road Trauma Committee, Personal communication.Google Scholar
  11. Ommaya, A. K. andHirsch, A. E. (1971) Tolerances for cerebral concussion from head impact and whiplash in primates.J. Biomechanics 4, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ommaya, A. K., Yarnell, P., Hirsch, A. E. andHarris, E. H. (1967) Scaling of experimental data on cerebral concussion in subhuman primates to concussion threshold for man. Proc. 11th Stapp Car Crash Conf., 47–52.Google Scholar
  13. O'Neill, B., Haddon, W., Kelley, A. B. andSorenson, W. W. (1972) Automobile head restraints: Frequency of neck injury insurance clais in relation to the presence of head restraints.Am. J. Public Health 62, 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts, S. B., Ward, C. C. andNahum, A. M. (1969) Head trauma—a parametric dynamic study.J. Biomechanics 2, 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Severy, D. M., Brink, H. M. andBaird, J. D. (1968) Vehicle design for passenger protection from high speed rear-end collisions. Proc. 12th Staph Car crash Conf., 94–163.Google Scholar
  16. Severy, D. M., Brink, H. M., Baird, J. D. andBlaisdell, D. M. (1969) Safer seat designs. Proc. 13th Stapp Car Crash Conf., 314–335.Google Scholar
  17. Severy, D. M., Mathewson, J. H. andBechtol, C. O. (1955) Controlled automobilic rear-endcollisions: an investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena. Medical Aspects of Traffic Accidents, Proc. Montreal Conf., 152–184.Google Scholar
  18. States, J. D. andBalcerak, J. C. (1973) The effectiveness of head restraints in rear end impacts. University of Rochester, School of Medicine Research Report, N.Y.Google Scholar
  19. Thomas, L. M., Roberts, V. L. andGurdjian, E. S. (1967) Impact induced pressure gradients along three orthogonal axes in the human skull.J. Neurosurg. 26, 316–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vulcan, A. P. andKing, A. I. (1971) Forces and moments sustained by the lower vertebral column during seat-to-head acceleration. In: Dynamic response of biomechenical systems, ASME, New York, 84–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical & Bological Engineering 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Fox
    • 1
  • J. F. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations