Skip to main content
Log in

Potential and current distribution in nerve: The effect of the nerve sheath, the number of fibers, and the frequency of alternating current stimulation

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential and current distribution in a nerve bundle is studied mathematically under various situations. Relations are derived expressing the effect of many fibers on the external potential, the value of the potential for a given nerve excitation pattern with and without the nerve sheath, the potential of a single fiber for a given outside potential pattern, and the effect of varying the frequency of alternating current stimulation. Results of the latter study are used to account for experimental deviations of the two-factor theory, and good agreement with the experimental results is found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Boole, G. 1946.A Treatise on the Calculus of Finite Differences. New York: G. E. Stechert and Co.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G. A. and R. M. Foster. 1942. “Fourier Integrals for Practical Applications.” American Telephone and Telegram Co.

  • Churchill, R. V. 1944.Modern Operational Mathematics in Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, H. J. and K. S. Cole. 1938. “Transverse Electric Impedance of the Squid Giant Axon.”Jour. Gen. Physiol.,21, 757–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlanger, J. and H. S. Gasser. 1937.Electrical Signs of Nervous Activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, H. S. and H. Grundfest. 1939. “Axon Diameters in Relation to the Spike Dimensions and the Conduction Velocity in Mammalian A Fibers.”Am. Jour. Physiol.,127, 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundfest, H. 1952. “Mechanism and Properties of Bioelectric Potentials.”Modern Trends in Physiology and Biochemistry, pp. 193–228. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. V. 1936. “Excitation and Accommodation in Nerve.”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B,119, 305–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, B. Katz, and D. Y. Solandt. 1936. “Nerve Excitation by Alternating Current.”Ibid.,121, 74–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, A. L. 1937. “A Local Electric Response in Crustacean Nerve.”Jour. Physiol.,91, 5p-7p.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1954. “A Note on Conduction Velocity.”Ibid.,125, 221–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and A. F. Huxley. 1939. “Action Potentials Recorded from Inside a Nerve Fibre.”Nature,144, 710–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1952. “A Quantitative Description of Membrane Current and Its Applicatio to Conduction and Excitation in Nerve.”Jour. Physiol.,117, 500–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, A. L. and W. A. H. Rushton. 1946. “The Electrical Constants of a Crustacean Nerve Fibre.”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lon. B.,133, 444–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, 1934.The Microphysiology of Nerve. Tokyo: Maruzen Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B. 1939a.Electrical Excitation of Nerve. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939b. “Nerve Excitation by High-Frequency Alternating Current.”Jour. Physiol.,96, 202–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorente de Nó, R. 1947. “A Study of Nerve Physiology. I.”Studies from the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research,131, New York: Rockefeller Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1950. “The Ineffectiveness of the Connective Tissue Sheath of Nerve as a Diffusion Barrier.”Jour. Cell. Comp. Physiol.,35, 195–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1952. “Observations on the Properties of the Epineurium of Frog Nerve.”Cold Spr. Harbor Symp.,17, 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussier, J. J. and W. A. H. Rushton. 1952. “The Excitability of a Single Fibre in a Nerve Trunk.”Jour. Physiol.,117, 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, L. and N. I. Adams. 1931.Principles of Electricity. New York: D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patlak, C. S. and H. D. Landhal. 1949. “A Note on the Two-Factor Theory with Rectification as Applied to Alternating Current Stimulation.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,11, 149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashbass, C. and W. A. H. Rushton. 1949. “The Relation of Structure to the Spread of Excitation in the Frog's Sciatic Trunk.”Jour. Physiol.,110, 110–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1948.Mathematical Biophysics, Rev. Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth, A., N. Wiener, W. Pitts, and J. Garcia Ramos, (with the assistance of F. Webster). 1948. “An Account of the Spike Potential of Axons.”Jour. Cell. Comp. Physiol.,32, 275–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, W. A. H. 1927. “The Effect upon the Threshold for Nervous Excitation of the Length of Nerve Exposed, and the Angle between Current and Nerve.”Jour. Physiol.,63, 357–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951. “A Theory of the Effects of Fibre Size in Medullated Nerve.”Ibid.,115, 101–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanes, A. M. 1954. “Effect of Sheath Removal on the Sciatic of the Toad, Bufo marinus.”Jour. Cell. Comp. Physiol.,43, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon, I. N. 1951.Fourier Transforms. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stämpfli, R. 1954. “Saltatory Conduction in Nerve.”Physiol. Rev.,34, 101–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasaki, I. 1953.Nervous Transmission. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. E. 1950. “Studies of the Effect of Externally Applied Currents on Frog Nerve.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1952. “The Distribution of Membrane Current in Nerve with Longitudinal Linearly Increasing Applied Current.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,14, 265–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patlak, C.S. Potential and current distribution in nerve: The effect of the nerve sheath, the number of fibers, and the frequency of alternating current stimulation. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 17, 287–307 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477755

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477755

Keywords

Navigation