An escape learning situation is discussed in terms of a neural model in which a stimulus can result in a conditioned excitement and a specific conditioned response. By using the simplest relations between the strengths of conditioning and the number of reinforcements and by introducing a distribution of fluctuations occurring regularly in time, one can calculate the probabilities of various responses, as well as the various latencies, in successive trials. The results are in moderately satisfactory agreement with the data of R. L. Solomon and L. C. Wynne (Psychol. Monogr.,67, No. 4, 1953). Consequences of the model for various experimental situations are discussed.
Unconditioned Stimulus Random Fluctuation Escape Response Warning Stimulus Escape Probability
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Brush, F. R., E. S. Brush, and R. L. Solomon. 1955. “Traumatic Avoidance Learning: The Effect of CS-US Interval with a Delayed-Conditioning Procedure.”Jour. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,48, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, R. R. and F. Mosteller. 1955.Stochastic Models for Learning. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.MATHGoogle Scholar
Landahl, H. D. 1962. “Mathematical Theory of the Central Nervous System.”Annals of the N.Y. Acad. Sci.,96, 1056–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landahl, H. D. 1964a. “Mathematical Models of Neural Activity.”Bionics Symposium of 1963, 105–120.Google Scholar
— 1964b. “An Avoidance Learning Situation. A Neural Net Model.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,26, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCleary, R. A. 1961. “Response Specificity in the Behavioral Effects of Limbic System Lesions in the Cat.”Jour. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,54, 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. L. and L. C. Wynne. 1953. “Traumatic Avoidance Learning: Acquisition in Normal Dogs.”Psychol. Monogr.,67, No. 4.Google Scholar