Abstract
The theory of imitative behavior as developed hitherto by the author was based on the assumption that each individual has a natural preference for one of the two mutually exclusive behaviors. The endogenous fluctuations in the central nervous system then result in the individual’s exhibiting the two behaviors alternately with a relative frequency determined by the natural preference. Imitation shifts the natural preference towards one or the other of the two mutually exclusive behaviors. In the present approach it is suggested that the relative frequency of the two mutually exclusive behaviors exhibited alternately is determined by maximizing the “satisfaction function” of the individual, that is by hedonistic factors rather than by purely random fluctuations. Corresponding equations are developed. It is shown that in certain cases, even when the imitation effect is absent, a sort of “pseudoimitation” may occur. Another situation leads, in the case of two individuals only, to a complete “division of labor” between them, with respect to the two behaviors. Each one exhibits only one behavior. After that imitation is introduced explicitly by assuming that imitation by one individual or another increases the satisfaction function of the imitating individual. Results thus obtained show similarities to the results of the old theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Landahl, H. D. 1938. “Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination.”Psychometrika,3, 107–125.
— 1950. “Mathematical Theory of Imitative Behavior in a Social Group with Finite Imitation Thresholds.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,12, 207–213.
Landau, H. G. 1950. “Note on the Effect of Imitation in Social Behavior.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,12, 221–235.
Rapoport, A. 1947a. “Mathematical Theory of Motivation Interactions of Two Individuals: I.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,9, 17–28.
— 1947b. “Mathematical Theory of Motivation Interactions of Two Individuals: II.”Ibid.,9, 41–61.
— 1947c. “Forms of Output Distribution Between Two Individuals Motivated by a Satisfaction Function.”Ibid.,9, 109–126.
— 1952. “Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Mass Behavior: I. The Propagation of Single Acts.”Ibid.,14, 159–169.
— 1956. “Some Game-Theoretical Aspects of Parasitism and Symbiosis.”Ibid. 18, 15–30.
— and C. Foster. 1956. “Parasitism and Symbiosis in anN-Person Non-Constant-Sum Continuous Game.”Ibid.,18, 219–231.
— and A. Shimbel. 1947. “Suggested Experimental Procedure for Determining the Satisfaction Function of Animals.”Ibid.,9, 169–177.
Rashevsky, N. 1947. “A Problem in Mathematical Biophysics of Interaction of Two or More Individuals Which May be of Interest in Mathematical Sociology.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,9, 9–15.
— 1949a. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior.”Ibid.,11, 105–113.
— 1949b. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior: II.”Ibid.,11 157–163.
— 1949c. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior: III.”Ibid.,11 255–271.
— 1949d. “A Neural Mechanism for Behavior.”Ibid.,11, 283–286.
— 1950. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior: IV. Imitation Effects as a Function of Distance.”Ibid.,12, 177–185.
— 1952a. “The Problem of Exchange between Two or More Individuals, Motivated by Hedonistic Considerations.”Ibid.,14, 137–140.
— 1952b. “Mathematical Biology of Division of Labor Between Two Individuals or Two Social Groups.”Ibid.,14, 213–227.
— 1953. “Imitative Behavior in Nonuniformly Spatially Distributed Populations.”Ibid.,15, 63–71.
— 1956. “Studies in Mathematical Biosociology of Imitative Behavior: I. Effects of Income Distribution.”Ibid.,18, 323–336.
— 1957. “Contributions to the Theory of Imitative Behavior.”Ibid.,19, 91–119.
— 1959.Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
— 1960. “On Imitative Behavior.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,22, 63–71.
— 1961. “On Imitative Behavior. II. Time Course of Change from One Behavior to Another.”Ibid.,23, 405–411.
— 1962. “Contributions to the Theory of Imitative Behavior: The Number of Political Parties as Determined by Biological and Social Factors.”Ibid.,24, 1–3.
— 1965a. “On Imitative Behavior.”Ibid.,27, 175–185.
— 1965b. “A Note on Imitative Behavior.”Ibid.,27, 311–313.
— 1966. “On Mass Behavior.”Ibid.,28, 465–475.
Smelser, Neil J. 1964.Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Thurstone, L. L. 1931. “The Indifference Function.”J. Soc. Psychol.,2, 139–167.
Trucco, Ernesto. 1954. “Studies in Imitative Behavior: A Generalization of the Rashevsky Model; its Mathematical Properties.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 279–316.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rashevsky, N. A suggestion for a new approach to the mathematical theory of imitative behavior. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 29, 863–877 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476933
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476933