Abstract
An effort is made to begin widening the scope of kinetics by merging the concepts and point of view of molecular set theory with the stochastic approach to kinetics, beginning with the simplest unimolecular molecular set transformation. In this spirit the new concept ofmolecular set variable is introduced as the basic unit of kinetics as opposed to simply the traditionalconcentration (or cardinality) unit, connoting that the composition as well as the size of a molecular set are significant dynamic features of a system. The changes in state (or “value”) of the molecular set variable are characterized by a Markovian stochastic process and the relationship between this process and the corresponding unimolecular process for the concentration variable introduced earlier is discussed. The possible role of molecular set theory in terms of the underlying biomathematical structure of relational biology is also considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Bartholomay, A. F. 1957. “A Stochastic Approach to Chemical Reaction Kinetics”. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
— 1958a. “On the Linear Birth and Death Processes of Biology as Markoff Chains”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 97–118.
— 1958b. “Stochastic Models for Chemical Reactions: I. Theory of the Unimolecular Reaction Process.”Ibid.,20, 175–190.
— 1959. “Stochastic Models for Chemical Reactions: II. The Unimolecular Rate Constant”.Ibid.,21, 363–373.
Bartholomay, A. F. 1960. “Molecular Set Theory: A Mathematical Representation for Chemical Reaction Mechanisms”.Ibid.,22, 285–307.
— 1962a. “Physicomathematical Foundations of Reaction Rate Theory”. InPhysicomathematical Aspects of Biology. Ed. N. Rashevsky. New York: Academic Press.
— 1962b. “A Stochastic Approach to Statistical Kinetics with Applications to Enzyme Kinetics”.Biochemistry,1, 223–230.
— 1965. “Molecular Set Theory. II: An Aspect of the Biomathematical Theory of Sets”.Bull. Math. Biophysics. Special Issue,27, 235–251.
— 1968. “Some General Ideas on Deterministic and Stochastic Models of Biological Systems”. InQuantitative Biology of Metabolism. (Ed. A. Locker). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 45–60.
Bartholomay, A. F. In press. “Chemical Kinetics and Enzyme Kinetics.” InTextbook in Mathematical Biology. New York: Academic Press.
Comorosan, S. and I. Bâianu. 1969. “Abstract Representations of Biological Systems in Supercategories”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,31, 59–70.
Eilenberg, S. and N. Steenrod. 1952.Foundations of Algebraic Topology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lefschetz, S. 1942.Algebraic Topology. American Mathematics Society Colloq. Publication XXVII. New York: American Mathematical Society.
Lotka, A. J. 1925.Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Rashevsky, N. 1954. “Topology and Life: In search of General Mathematical Principles in Biology and Sociology”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 317–348.
—. 1967. “Organismic Sets: Outline of a General Theory of Biological and Social Organisms”.Ibid.,29, 139–152.
—. 1968. “Organismic Sets: II. Some General Considerations”.Ibid.,30, 163–174.
—. 1969. “Outline of a Unified Approach to Physics, Biology and Sociology”.Ibid.,31, 159–198.
Rosen, R. 1958a. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 245–260.
—. 1958b. “The Representation of Biological Systems from the Standpoint of the Theory of Categories”.Ibid.,22, 227–255.
Woodger, J. H. 1952. “Biology and Language”.The Tarner Lectures, 1949–50. Cambridge: Cambridge at the University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartholomay, A.F. Molecular set theory. III: The wide sense kinetics of molecular sets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 33, 355–372 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476779
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476779