Abstract
Response probabilities are interpreted from two points of view. One corresponds to fluctuations in physical parameters suggestive of a neurological basis, and the other corresponds to fluctuations in stimulus sample constitution. The two interpretations are shown to be equivalent under rather general conditions, giving the same type of relation between response and training states. This relation is different from that obtained via the response strength concept used in Part I. As a step toward evaluating the difference in predicted behavior for these different response-training relations, a general functional-difference equation is derived that describes the moments of the corresponding stochastic process in experimenter-subject controlled experiments. As an immediate application, it is used to obtain the continuity condition for the solution of the functional equation treated in Part I, and to justify the differentiability conditions assumed in establishing asymptotic properties of the solution as a function of the reinforcement parameter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Estes, W.K. 1950. “Toward a Statistical Theory of Learning.”Psychol. Rev.,57, 94–107.
Householder, A.S. and H.D. Landahl. 1945.Mathematical Biophysics of the Central Nervous System. Bloomington, Ind.: Principia Press.
Landahl, H.D. 1938. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination.”Psychometrika,3, 107–125.
Martinez, H.M. 1963. “Studies in Stochastic Learning Theory: I.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,26, 393–419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinez, H.M. Studies in stochastic learning theory: II. Interpretation of response probabilities. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 26, 63–75 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476623
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476623