Skip to main content
Log in

The inconsistencies of present-day mathematical-physical methods pertaining to current generators in volume conductors used in electrocardiography

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present-day practices of electrocardiography and vectorardiography are based upon the theory that the surface potential differences can be assumed to be due to a single dipole inside the body. It is shown in this paper that a dipole cannot account for all the surface potentials due to realistic current generators, and hence the determination of the current generator from surface potential measurements based upon such a theory will lead to inconsistent representations of the heart for one and the same subject.

To demonstrate this point two eccentric dipoles of different strengths and locations representing two muscle fibers are taken to be the current generator in a homogeneous spherical conductor. The exact surface potentials are then expressed by means of the “interior sphere theorem” of the authors. With these expressions the magnitude, direction, and location of the resultant dipole are determined by the method of D. Gabor and C. V. Nelson (J. App. Physics,25, 413–16, 1954). The surface potentials due to this resultant dipole are again exactly expressed by means of the “interior sphere theorem” and compared with those due to the eccentric dipoles assumed. It can be seen that the differences can be considerable.

It is suggested that the multipole model of the authors (Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 203–16, 1958) be used as a more accurate and the only unique representation of the heart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Gabor, D., and C. V. Nelson. 1954. “Determination of the Resultant Dipole of the Heart from Measurements on the Body Surface.”J. App. Physics,25, 413–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludford, G. S. S., J. Martinek, and G. C. K. Yeh. 1955. “The Sphere Theorem in Potential Theory.”Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.,51, 389–93.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, R. H. 1958. “Multiple Dipole Representation of the Human Heart for Vectorcardiography.”Science,127, 240–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, G. C. K., J. Martinek, and G. S. S. Ludford. 1955. “The Potentials due to Certain Singularities in the Presence of a Fixed Sphere.”J. Soc. Indust. App. Math.,3, 142–52.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, G. C. K., J. Martinek, and H. de Beaumont. 1958. “Multipole Representations of Current Generators in a Volume Conductor.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 203–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported by the National Heart Institute under a research grant H-2263(c).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinek, J., Yeh, G.C.K. & de Beaumont, H. The inconsistencies of present-day mathematical-physical methods pertaining to current generators in volume conductors used in electrocardiography. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 21, 61–70 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476458

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476458

Keywords

Navigation