Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 265–267 | Cite as

State-of-the art report: the use of damage classification systems for concrete structures

  • K. R. Lauer
RILEM Technical Committees Damage Classification of Concrete Structures 104-DCC

Keywords

Concrete Structure Transportation Research Condition Survey Concrete Pavement Transportation Research Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Resume

On examine ici quelques-unes des nombreuses méthodes qui permettent d’appliquer les systèmes de classification des dommages aux évaluations globales à partir desquelles on peut entreprendre les travaux de maintenance et de réparation. On considère tout à la fois la nature objective et subjective des informations. Ce rapport a été préparé au sein de la Commission de la RILEM 104-DCC. Toute discussion de ce rapport serait bienvenue.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lauer, K. R., ‘A world-wide review of reference standards developed for the visual observation of concrete’, in Proceedings of Inter-Association Colloquium (IABSE-FIP-CEB-RILEM-IASS) on Behaviour in Service of Concrete Structures, Liege, June 1975.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muller, K. F., ‘Principles of a standard survey and damage classification system for concrete structures’, in Proceedings of International Conference on Diagnosis of Concrete Structures (RILEM-IMEKO), Brataslava, September 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bund/Länder-Fachausschuß Brücken- und Ingenieurbau, ‘Richtlinie zur einheitlichen Erfassung, Bewertung, Aufzeichnung und Auswertung von Ergebnissen der Bauwerksprüfungen nach DIN 1076’, Ri-EBW-Pruf 88 (Verkehrsblatt-Verlag Borgmann GMbH, Dortmund, 1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ACI Committee 201, ‘Guide for making a condition survey of concrete in-service’, ACI 201.1R-68 (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, 1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Idem., ACI Committee 201 ‘Guide for making a condition survey of concrete pavements’, ACI 201.3R-86 (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, 1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 312, ‘Condition surveys of concrete bridge components—user’s manual’ (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1988).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engineers’ Manual No. 1110-2-2002, ‘Engineering and design—evaluation and repair of concrete structures’ (Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, 1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 277, ‘Portland cement concrete pavement evaluation system’ (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1985).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butler, B. C., Jr, Carmichael, R. F., III, Flanagan, P. and Finn, F. N., ‘Evaluating alternative maintenance strategies’, National Cooperative Highway Research Report 285 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, B. J., ‘An application of structural monitoring’, in ‘Building Structures’, Proceedings of Structure Congress Structural Division (American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1987) pp. 294–304.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chou, Chia-Pei and McCullough, B. Frank, ‘Development of a distress index and rehabilitation criteria for continuously reinforced concrete pavements using discriminant analysis’, Transportation Research Record 1117 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1987), pp. 76–82.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Talsuako, M. M., ‘Multivariate Analysis: Techniques for Education and Psychological Research’ (Wiley, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Federal Highway Administration, ‘Recording and coding guide for the structural inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges’ (US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ministry of Communications, ‘Technical specification for highway maintenance’, JTJ 073-85 (People’s Communication Publishing House, Beijing, 1986) (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Finnish Roads Administration, ‘Bridge Inspection Manual’ (1989).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tee, A. B., Bowman, M. D. and Sinha, K. C., ‘Application of fuzzy logic to condition assessment of concrete slab bridges’, Transportation Research Record 1184 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1988), pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zadeh, L. A., ‘Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control’, Vol. 8 (Academic, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bowman, M. D., Nordmark, G. E. and Yao, J. T., ‘Fuzzy logic approach in metal fatigue’,Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 1 (1987) 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moses, F., Ghosn, M. and Snyder, R. E., ‘Application of load spectra to bridge rating’, Transportation Research Record 950, Second Bridge Engineering Conferences, Vol. 1 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1984) pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ogawa, H., Fu, K. S. and Yao, J. T. P., ‘Speril II: an expert system for damage assessment of existing structures’, in ‘Approximate Reasoning in Expert Systems’, M. M. Guptaet al., editors (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985) pp. 731–744.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yao, J. T. P., ‘Damage assessment of existing structures’,J. Engng Mech. Div. ASCE 106 (ME4) (1980) 785–799.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. R. Lauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations