Skip to main content
Log in

Disturbance of natural vegetation by camping: Experimental applications of low-level stress

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previously undisturbed sites in four different vegetation types were camped on for one night and for four nights. Changes in vegetation cover and vegetation height were measured after camping and one year later. Results are presented separately for different campsite zones—parts of the site where campers slept, cooked meals, and stored their packs. Just one night of camping was sufficient to cause evident impact in all four vegetation types, although the amount of impact varied significantly between zones and between vegetation types. Vegetation impact on campsites used four nights was generally less than twice as severe as impact on the sites used one night. The effects of camping on vegetation were also predicted for 12 other vegetation types on the basis of vegetational responses to experimental trampling. These results suggest that impact can almost always be minimized by confining camping to a small number of campsites instead of dispersing use across many campsites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bayfield, N. G. 1979. Recovery of four montane heath communities on Cairngorm, Scotland, from disturbance by trampling.Biological Conservation 15:165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogucki, D. J., J. L. Malanchuk, and T. E. Schenck. 1975. Impact of short-term camping on ground-level vegetation.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 30:231–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, S. P., M. G. Hickler, and J. H. Graves, 1978. Visitor impact on backcountry campsites in the Great Smoky Mountains.Environmental Management 2:431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1981. Vegetational changes associated with recreational use and fire suppression in the Eagle Cap Wilderness, Oregon: Some management implications.Biological Conservation 20:247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1986. Recreational impacts on backcountry campsites in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA.Environmental Management 10:651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1987. Effects of three seasons of experimental trampling on five montane forest communities and a grassland in western Montana, USA.Biological Conservation 40:219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1988. Disturbance and recovery of trampled montane grassland and forests in Montana. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-389, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah, 37 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1991. Modeling wilderness campsites: Factors that influence amount of impact.Environmental Management 16:255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1993. Trampling effects on mountain vegetation in Washington, Colorado, New Hampshire, and North Carolina. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-464, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N., and N. G. Bayfield. 1993. Recreational trampling of vegetation: Standard experimental procedures.Biological Conservation 63:209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N., and R. K. Fichtler. 1983. Campsite impact on three western wilderness areas.Environmental Management 7:275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N., and J. L. Marion. 1988. Recreation impacts in some riparian forests of the eastern United States.Environmental Management 12:99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, S. S., and D. P. Duncan. 1965. Campsite preference and deterioration in the Quetico-Superior canoe country.Journal of Forestry 65:256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. N. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments.Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuss, F. R., A. R. Graefe, and J. J. Vaske. 1990. Visitor impact management: A review of research. National Parks and Conservation Association, Washington, DC, 256 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R. E., J. M. McBride, P. W. Conkling, and J. L. McMahon. 1983. Ground cover changes resulting from low-level camping stress on a remote site. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-530, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, Pennsylvania, 4 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, J. L., and L. C. Merriam. 1985. Recreational impacts on well-established campsites in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. University of Minnesota Agricultural Station Bulletin AD-SB-2502, St. Paul, Minnesota, 16 pp.

  • Washburne, R. F., and D. N. Cole. 1983. Problems and practices in wilderness management: A survey of managers. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-304, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, D.N. Disturbance of natural vegetation by camping: Experimental applications of low-level stress. Environmental Management 19, 405–416 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471982

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471982

Key Words

Navigation