Skip to main content
Log in

Risk management: Time for innovative approaches

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk management practices under the current environmental regulations is a long, complex process that considers scientific, technologic, and management factors to develop various regulatory standards and pollution control measures. Using the mandatory enforcement approach, sometimes referred to as “command-and-control”, a set of preliminary environmental goals, such as better air and water qualities, were achieved. However, the information-intensive nature of the risk management process and the lack of flexibility in conventional regulatory methods to changing economic and technologic realities of the decade has created interest among risk managers to examine some innovative management approaches. Above all, environmental problems of a global scale require novel management methods while striving to achieve the desired environmental goals.

As the principal analytical tool in risk management, quantitative risk assessment exerts considerable influence on the risk management process. Therefore, advances in risk management are closely associated with scientific developments that enhance the risk assessment process, particularly those efforts aimed at improving human exposure and toxicity assessments. Market incentives, information dissemination, creative enforcement practices, and interagency and intergovernmental interactions were identified as the key elements of innovative environmental risk management practices. This paper will present an overview of the emerging innovative risk management approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alm, A. 1989. The future of future risk.Environmental Science and Technology 23:1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, A. 1992. A need for new approaches.EPA Journal 18(2):7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, J. S. 1991. The perils of unreasonable risk: Information, regulatory policy and toxic substances control.Columbia Law Review 91:261–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., and R. C. Lind. 1970. Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions.American Economic Review 60:364–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmaster, D. E., and K. Von Stackelberg. 1992. Using Monte Carlo simulations in public health risk assessments: Estimating and presenting full distributions of risk.Journal of the International Society for Exposure Analysis 1:491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1987. Unfinished business: A comparative assessment of environmental problems, overview report. Office of Policy Analysis. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1990a. Science Advisory Board; Relative risk reduction project, appendices A-C; The report on the strategic options subcommitee. EPA/SAB-EC-90-021C. Washington, DC.

  • EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1990b. Longrange research agenda: 1990–1994. EPA/600/9-90/024. Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1990c. Toxic Substances Control Act chemical substances inventory (1990 suppl. to 1985 edition)—user's guide and indices. EPA/560/7-90-003. Washington, DC.

  • EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1991. Economic incentives: Options for environmental protection. Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, 21P-2001, March, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, A. M. 1990. Confronting uncertainty in risk assessment—a guide for decision-markers. Center for Risk Management, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, S. E. 1990. Science, politics, and the management of toxic risks through law.Jurimetrics, 30:271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L. D. and A. M. Jarabek. 1990. Research on risk assessment and risk management: Future directions.Toxicology and Industrial Health 6:217–233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1965. Investment decision under uncertainty: Choice-theoretic approaches.Quarterly Journal of Economics 79:509–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J., and J. G. Riley. 1979. The analytics of uncertainty and information—an exposition survey.Journal of Economic Literature 17:1375–1421.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health). 1987. Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances (RTECS). Doris V. Sweet (ed.). NIOSH-87-114. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control. Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Drinking water and health: Selected issues in risk assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1981. OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. R. 1992. Noncancer health risks for residents located in the vicinity of drycleaners. Report submitted to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Directorate of Science and Policy Programs, Washington, DC.

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. 1991. Tort law as a regulatory system—regulation and the law of torts.American Economic Review 81:54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1987. Economic analysis of accident law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W., II, L. W. Barnthouse, and R. V. O'Neill. 1987. Treatment of risk in environmental impact statement.Environmental Management 11:295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, V.R. Risk management: Time for innovative approaches. Environmental Management 19, 313–320 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471974

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471974

Key Words

Navigation