Abstract
An 11-year period of water quality data, collected by the Directorate of Sate Water Works of Turkey are thoroughly analyzed for the purpose of implementing water quality classes to water resources in the Meric Basin, located on the European land mass of Turkey. Water quality parameters are divided into four groups as physical, organic, inorganic, and bacteriological. The quality class of each group is evaluated by taking into account the poorest quality of any parameter in the group, after which a quality rank is assigned to the sampling station and the waterbody in question. This method of water quality classification imposed by the Turkish Water Quality Act, is then criticized with respect to a statistical approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Abreu, R. M., and M. R. Guazzelli. 1987. A comparative study of inland water quality—Sao Paulo (Brazil), France and England.Water Science and Technology 19:125–132.
EPFT (Environmental Problems Foundation of Turkey). 1989. Environmental Legislation in EC and Turkey. Ankara, 115 pp.
Hartmann, G. 1991. Protection of drinking water resources in Germany. Pages 139–154in Proceedings of the international symposium on management strategies of surface water resources, 4–6 November 1991, Istanbul, Turkey.
Havilcek, L. L., and R. Crain. 1988. Practical statistics for the physical sciences. American Chemical Society. Washington, DC., 489 pp.
Jovicic, M., and A. Filip. 1987. Water quality control plan for Wet Moravia River Basin in Yugoslavia.Water Science and Technology 19:9–18.
Norwegian SFT (State Pollution Control Authority). 1990. The future is now. Oslo, 82 pp.
State Water Works. 1979–1991. Water quality observation reports.
Turkish Water Pollution Control Act. 1988. Official Gazette. No 19919.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ince, N., Yenigün, O. A critical review of the water quality classification system in Turkey: A case study on Meric Basin. Environmental Management 19, 601–607 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471971
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471971