Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulus-dependent effects in the actions of sodium channel blockers on sensory C-units

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stimulus-dependent inhibition of discharges from cutaneous C fibers from mechanothermosensitive (MTS) units (nociceptive sensors) can explain the paradoxical analgesic effect of local anesthetics at low concentrations, insufficient to block axonal conduction of nerve impulses. Three types of experiments are proposed which could detect the stimulus-dependent inhibition of the terminal section of sensory C units: a method involving repeated series of stimuli, the increasing stimulus method, and the spike encounter method. The applications of these methods to assessing the magnitudes of the neuroleptic effects of local anesthetics and cardiac antiarrhythmics is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. V. Borovikova, D. V. Borovikov, V. V. Ermishkin, and S. V. Revenko, “Tonic and stimulus-dependent inhibition by lidocaine and N-propylajmaline of the responses of polymodal C-units in cat skin to thermal stimuli.”Sensor. Sistemy,11, No. 2, 107–117 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. E. Vvedenskii, “Excitation, inhibition, anesthesia,” in:Physiology of the Nervous System [in Russian], GIML, Moscow (1952), Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. V. Revenko, V. V. Ermishkin, and L. Ya. Selektor, “Excitation of group C mechanosensitive sensory units in the cat skin in conditions of intra-arterial administration of potassium ions,”Neirofiziologiya,20, No. 2, 147–154 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. V. Revenko, L. V. Baidakova, V. V. Ermishkin, N. A. Mangusheva, and L. Ya. Selektor, “Studies of pain reception in the skin using chemical agents,”Neirofiziologiya,24, No. 5, 517–529 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. V. Revenko, L. V. Borovikova, D. V. Borovikov, and V. V. Ermishkin, “Resistance of the terminal part of polymodal C-units of cat skin to tetrodotoxin during excitation with mechanical and thermal stimuli,”Byull. Éksp. Biol. Med. 124, No. 10, 369–371 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. B. I. Khodorov, “Two mechanisms of ‘stimulus-dependent’ action of pharmacological agents on the electrical and contractile activities of myocardial cells,”Kardiologiya,20, No. 5, 7–10 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. E. Abram and T. L. Yaksh, “Systemic lidocaine blocks nerve injury-induced hyperalgesia and nociceptor-driven spinal sensitization in the rat,”Anesthesiology,80, 383–391 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. V. Borovikova, D. V. Borovikov, V. V. Ermishkin, and S. V. Revenko, “The resistance of cutaneous feline C-fiber mechano-heat-sensitive unit termination to tetrodotoxin and its possible relation to tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel,”Prim Sensory Neuron.,2, No. 1, 65–75 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. R. Courtney, “Mechanism of frequency-dependent inhibition of sodium currents in frog myelinated nerve by the lidocaine derivative GEA968,”J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,195, No. 2, 225–236 (1975).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. R. Courtney, J. J. Kending, and E. N. Cohen, “Frequency-dependent conduction block. The role of nerve impulse pattern in local anesthetic potency,”Anesthesiology,48, No. 2, 111–117 (1978).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. W. W. Douglas and J. M. Ritchie, “A technique for recording functional activity in specific groups of medullated and non-medullated fibers in whole nerve trunks,”J. Physiol. (London),138, 19–30 (1957).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. B. R. Fink and A. M. Cairns, “Differential use-dependent (frequency-dependent) effects in single mammalian axons: data and clinical considerations,”Anesthesiology,67, No. 4, 477–484 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Hille, “Local anesthetics: hydrophilic and hydrophobic pathways for drug-receptor reaction,”J. Gen. Physiol.,69, No. 4, 497–515 (1977).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. L. V. Hondeghem and B. G. Katzung, “Time-and voltage-dependent interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with cardiac sodium channels,”Biochem. Biophys. Acta,472, 373–398 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. A. Johnson and M. G. McKinnon, “The differential effects of quinidine and pyrilamine on the myocardial action potential at various rates of stimulation,”J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,120, 460–468 (1957).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Khodorov, L. Shishkova, E. Peganov, and S. Revenko, “Inhibition of sodium currents in frog Ranvier node treated with local anesthetics. Role of slow sodium inactivation,”Biochim. Biophys. Acta 433, 409–435 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. I. Khodorov and L. D. Zaborovskaya, “Blockage of Na+ and K+ channels in the node of Ranvier by ajmaline and N-propylajmaline,”Gen. Physiol. Biophys.,2, 233–268 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. G. Kirchoff, P. W. Reeh, and P. J. Waddell, “Sensory endings of C-and A-fibers are differentially sensitive to tetrodotoxin in the rat skin, in vivo,”J. Physiol. (London),418, 116 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. H. LaMotte, J. G. Thalhammer, and C. J. Robinson, “Peripheral neural correlates of magnitude of cutaneous pain and hyperalgesia: a comparison of neural events in monkey with sensory judgments in human,”J. Neurophysiol.,50, 1–26 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. V. Reveko, L. V. Borovikova, D. V. Borovikov, and V. V. Ermishkin, “Transformation of pressure-and heat-induced discharges of feline cutaneous C-fiber mechano-heat-sensitive units by lidocaine and N-propylajmaline,”Prim. Sensory Neuron,3, No. 1, 31–48 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. L. Roy and T. Narahashi, “Differential properties of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons,”J. Neurosci.,12, 2104–2111 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. R. Strichartz, “The inhibition of sodium currents in myelimated nerve by quaternary derivatives of lidocaine,”J. Gen. Physiol.,62, No. 1, 37–57 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. D. L. Tanelian and W. G. Brose, “Neuropathic pain can be relieved by drugs that are use-dependent sodium channel blockers: lidocaine, carbamazepine, and mexiletine,”Anesthesiology,74, 949–951 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. D. L. Tanelian and M. B. MacIver, “Analgesic concentrations of lidocaine suppress tonic A-delta and C-fiber discharges produced by acute injury,”Anesthesiology,74, 934–936 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Van Hees, “Human C-fiber input during painful and nonpainful skin stimulation with radiant heat,”Adv. Pain Res. Ther.,1, 35–40 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Van Hees and J. Gybels, “C nociceptor activity in human nerve during painful and nonpainful skin stimulation,”J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.,44, 600–607 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 119–127, January, 1999.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Revenko, S.V., Borovikova, L.V. & Ermishkin, V.V. Stimulus-dependent effects in the actions of sodium channel blockers on sensory C-units. Neurosci Behav Physiol 30, 339–345 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471788

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471788

Key Words

Navigation