Advertisement

The Japanese journal of surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 503–509 | Cite as

“Radical” abdominal cancer surgery: Current state and future course

  • Joseph G. Fortner
Review Article

Abstract

Biologically driven cancer surgery is essential for the best care of the cancer patient. Modern technology and support have improved the safety and operative results of radical surgery. Better understanding of tumor biology with technical advances permit rational,en bloc resection of the primary cancer and regional lymphatic drainage with better cure rates. The author has operated on 1103 patients with liver tumors since 1970. The liver tumors were resected in 415 patients, with major hepatic resections being done in 359. Since 1979, the author carried out 62 regional pancreatectomies. Thirty-three were for stage 1 or 2 adenocarcinomas of the head of the pancreas. The 5-year actual survival was 31 per cent. There has been similar improvement in treating ampullary and periampullary cancer, gallbladder cancer, or extrahepatic bile duct cancer. These data show significant improvement in the results of treating cancer by radical or biologically driven surgery. Abdominal cancer is not a generalized disease until late in its course.

Key Words

radical surgery liver cancer regional pancreatectomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shimkin MB. Contrary to Nature. PEW Publication No. (NIH) 76-720. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Public Health Service National Institute of Health, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Enker WE, Laffer UT, Block GE. Enhanced survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer is based upon wide anatomic resection. Ann Surg 1979; 190: 350–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nakayama K. Compilation of surgical publication by Professor Komei Nakayama, M.D. The 2nd Surgical Department, Chiba University Medical School, Chiba, Japan, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakayama K. Evaluation of the various operative methods for total gastrectomy. Surgery 1956; 40: 488–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arhelger SW, Lober PH, Wangensteen OH. Dissection of the hepatic pedicle and retropancreaticoduodenal areas for cancer of the stomach. Surgery 1955; 38: 675–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kajitani T, Hoshino T. Combined pancreaticosplenectomy in gastric cancer. Geka Shinryo (Surgical Therapy) 1964; 10: 80–86. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakayama K. Pancreaticosplenectomy combined with gastrectomy in cancer of the stomach. Surgery 1956; 40: 297–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suzuki J. Combined resection of the pancreas tail. Rinsho Gaka (Journal of Clinical Surgery) 1954; 9: 315–318. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Douglass HO Jr. Gastric Cancer. New York, Churchill Livingstone 1988; 147.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fortner JG, Silva JS, Golbey RB, Cox EB, Maclean BJ. Multivariate analysis of a personal series of 247 consecutive patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. 1. Treatment by hepatic resection. Ann Surg 1984; 199: 306–316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fortner JG. Recurrence of colorectal cancer after hepatic resection. Am J Surg 1988; 155: 378–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honjo I, Araki C. Total resection of the right lobe of the liver. J Int Surg 1955; 23: 23–28.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S, Makuuchi M, Shimamura Y. Pre, intra, and postoperative care of hepatectomized patients with cirrhosis. Shoukaki Geka (Gastroenterological Surgery) 1983; 6: 1719–1724. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawano N, Ohmori Y, Inoue S, Nagao T, Morioka Y. Long-term prognosis of surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1989; 23: 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nagao T, Inoue S, Goto S, Mizuta T, Omori Y, Kawano N, Morioka Y. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical features and long-term prognosis. Ann Surg 1987; 205: 33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hasuike Y, Monden M, Valdivia LA, Kubota N, Gotoh M, Nakano Y, Okamura J, Mori T. A simple method for orthotopic liver transplantation with arterial reconstruction in rats. Transplantation 1988; 45: 830–832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsuchimoto S, Kakita A, Uchino J, Mizumo K, Niiyama T, Fujii H, Matsuno Y, Natori T, Aizawa M. Mechanism of tolerance in rat liver transplantation: evidence for the existence of suppressor cells. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 514–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fortner JG. Regional resection of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery 1973; 73: 307–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fortner JG. Surgical principles for pancreatic cancer: regional total and subtotal pancreatectomy. Cancer 1981; 47: 1712–1719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fortner JG. Regional pancreatectomy for cancer of the pancreas, ampulla, and other related sites. Ann Surg 1984; 199: 418–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miyazai I, Nagakawa T. Presentation at the 32nd Congress of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanazawa, Japan, July 1988.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williams JA, Cubilla A, Maclean BJ, Fortner JG. Twenty-two year experience with periampullary carcinoma at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Am J Surg 1979; 138: 662–665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Surgical Society 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph G. Fortner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations