Skip to main content
Log in

Esophageal cancer from the german point of view

  • Review Articles
  • Published:
The Japanese journal of surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there are no differences worth mentioning between esophageal cancer in Japan and in Europe regarding epidemiology, tumor stages at the beginning of therapy and surgical selection. In Japan, early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is more often diagnosed than in Europe where esophageal adenocarcinoma, especially that of the endobrachyesophagus, is becoming more and more relevant. For a long time, the limiting factor for the prognosis of esophageal cancer was the postoperative lethality. However, by carefully analysing the factors influencing this operative lethality over the last few years, the lethality following esophagectomy has been decreased to approximately 15 per cent. In fact, in some specialized centers, the lethality is now less than 10 per cent and in selected patient groups even 3 per cent has been reached. It is only through this achievement that the prognosis for esophageal cancer has been able to be markedly improved. The results of this analysis can be detailed as follows: 1) The preoperative definition of tumor stage by CT or MRI is not reliable, the validity being between 45 per cent and 73 per cent. Therefore, no therapeutical decisions can be made on the basis of these diagnostic procedures. Hopefully the intraluminal ultrasound will improve this situation in the future. 2) The analysis of preoperative nutritional status did not allow a definition of risk groups. 3) Decisive improvements were able to be achieved by the standardising of surgical procedures and indications. Enbloc resection is indicated for all intrathoracic squamous cell carcinomas and accounts for a high percentage of RO-resections. The blunt dissection is especially appropriate for distal adenocarcinomas. 4) Endobronchial onesided ventilation during the operation and prophylatic assisted ventilation have both decreased the pulmonary risk considerably. A further improvement in the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma can possibly be achieved by the preoperative identification of advanced tumors (T3/T4) and preoperatively treating these tumor types accordingly. From our own experience, we believe combined radio-chemotherapy could be successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siewert JR, Roder JD. Chirurgische Therapie des Plattenepithelcarcinom des Oesophagus-erweiterte Radikalität. Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongreß-bericht) 1987; 372: 129–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matthews HR, Powell DJ, McConkey CC. Effect of surgical experience on the results of resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 621–623.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Froelicher P, Miller G. The European experience with esophageal cancer limited to the mucosa and submucosa. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1986; 32: 88–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siewert JR, Hölscher AH. Der Endobrachyoesophagus als Präcancerose. Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongreßbericht) 1986, 326: 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehr L, Rupp N, Siewert JR: Assessment of resectability of esophageal cancer by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Surgery 1988; 103(3): 344–350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Giuli R, Sancho-Garnier H. Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic features of cancers of the esophagus: Results of the international prospective study conducted by the OESO group (790 patients). Surgery 1986; 99: 614–622.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Siewert JR, Hölscher AH (eds) Diseases of the Esophagus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandmair W, Lehr L. Frühe postoperative enterale Ernährung nach Oesophagusresektion. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1988; 373 (in press).

  9. Nishi M, Hiramatsu Y, Hioki K, Kojima Y, Sanada T, Yamanaka H, Yamamoto M. Risk factors in relation to postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy of gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 1988; 207: 148–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Siewert JR. Leistungen der Tumorchirurgie bei Tumoren der Speiseröhre. Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongreßbericht) 1988 (in press).

  11. Siewert JR, Adolf J, Bartels H, Hölscher AH, Hölscher M, Weiser HF. Ösophaguskarzinom: transthorakale Ösophagektomie mit regionaler Lymphadenektomie und Rekonstruktion mit aufgeschobener Dringlichkeit. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1986; 111: 647–651.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chasseray VM Kiroff GK, Buard JL, Launois B. Oesophageaktomie wegen Carcinoma: Cervikale oder thorakale Anastomose? Langenbecks Arch Chir (in press).

  13. Siewert JR, Hlscher AH. Treatment of dysphagia in esophageal carcinoma: transthoracic “en-bloc” esophagectomy and reconstruction 48 hours later. Dysphagia (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siewert, J.R. Esophageal cancer from the german point of view. The Japanese Journal of Surgery 19, 11–20 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471561

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471561

Key Words

Navigation