Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of locally defined learning rules and their coordination in feedforward neural networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a method to evolve adaptive behavior of learning in an artificial neural network (ANN). The adaptive behavior of learning emerges from the coordination of learning rules. Each learning rule is defined as a function of local information of a corresponding neuron only and modifies the connective strength between the neuron and its neighbors. It is exposed to selective pressure based on the fitness value, which represents the importance in producing the correct output signals of the ANN. The learning rules with lower fitness values are replaced by new ones generated by genetic programming techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method produces adaptive behavior of learning in single-layered and two-layered ANNs. This means that efficient learning rules evolve. Further, the learning rules in the two-layered ANN coordinate with each other and macroscopic adaptive behavior of learning emerges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koza JR, Rice JP (1991) Generation of both the weights and architecture for a neural network. IJCNN-91-Seattle, vol II, pp 397–404

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano H (1994) Neurogenetic learning: an integrated method of designing and training neural networks using genetic algorithms. Physica D 75:225–238

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bornholdt S, Graudenz D (1992) General asymmetric neural networks and structure design by genetic algorithms. Neural Networks 5:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maniezzo V (1994) Genetic evolution of the topology and weight distribution of neural networks. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks 5(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ackley D, Littman M (1991) Interactions between learning and evolution. Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol X, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chalmers DJ (1990) The evolution of learning: an experiment in genetic connectionism. Proceedings of the 1990 Connectionist Models Summer School, San Mateo

  7. Koza JR (1994) Genetic programming II: automatic discovery of reusable programs. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matsunaga Y, Murase K, Yamakawa O et al. (1996) A modified back-propagation algorithm that automatically removes redundant hidden unit by competition (in Japanese). Trans IEICE, Part D-II, J79-D-II(3):403–412

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murao H, Kitamura S (1996) Evolution of locally defined learning rules and their coodination in feedforward neural networks. In: Sugisaka M (ed) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB1), Beppu, Oita, Japan, Feb 18–20, pp 183–186

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajime Murao.

About this article

Cite this article

Murao, H., Kitamura, S. Evolution of locally defined learning rules and their coordination in feedforward neural networks. Artificial Life and Robotics 1, 89–94 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471120

Key words

Navigation