The Japanese journal of surgery

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 112–117 | Cite as

Open mitral commissurotomy for recurrent mitral stenosis after closed commissurotomy

  • Susumu Nakano
  • Hajime Hirose
  • Hikaru Matsuda
  • Shigeo Sato
  • Yasunaru Kawashima
Original Articles


We evaluated the long-term results in 43 patients who had undergone open mitral commissurotomy for recurrent mitral stenosis after closed commissurotomy. There was one operative death (2.3 percent) and one case of reoperation (2.3 percent). Twenty patients (42 percent) were in NYHA Class I and 22 patients (51 percent) in Class II. In 12 randomly selected patients subjected to postoperative cardiac catheterization, the pulmonary arterial mean pressure remained high at rest and increased to 48 mmHg (mean) during exercise with significant differences in patients who underwent open mitral commissurotomy in the first operation (control group). The left atrial mean pressure was significantly high at rest and rose to 27 mmHg (mean) during exercise. The pulmonary vascular resistance also increased during exercise, with significant differences for the control group.

We conclude from these studies that the less satisfactory clinical improvement in patients undergoing reoperation apparently was related to advanced pathology of the mitral valve and development of pulmonary vascular disease.

Key Words

open mitral commissurotomy closed mitral commissurotomy reoperation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sellors TH, Bedford DE, Somerville W. Valvotomy in the treatment of mitral stenosis. Brit Med J 1953; 14: 1059–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glenn WWL, Calabrese C, Goodyear AVN, Hume M, Stansel CH. Mitral valvulotomy. A report of 500 cases. Am J Surg 1966; 117: 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis LB, Singh JB, Morales DD, Harken DE: Fifteen-to twenty-year study of one thousand patients undergoing closed mitral valvuloplasty. Circulation 1973; 48: 357–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grantham RN, Daggett WM, Cosini AB, Buckley MJ, Mundth ED, McEnany MT, Scannell JG, Austen WG. Transventricular mitral valvulotomy. Analysis of factors influencing operative and late results. Circulation 1974; 49 & 50 (Suppl. II): 200–212.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salerno TA, Neilson IR, Charrette EJ, Lynn RB. A 25-year experience with the closed method of treatment in 139 patients with mitral stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1981; 31: 300–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rutledge R, McIntosh CL, Morrow AG, Picken CA, Siwek LG, Zwischenberger JB, Schier JJ. Mitral valve replacement after closed mitral commissurotomy. Circulation 1982; 66 (Suppl. I): 162–166.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sealy WC, Young WG. Acquired mitral stenosis. An inquiry into its progressive and recurrent nature and the influence of preventive measures and surgery on its natural history. Ann Thorac Surg 1965; 1: 244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Logan A, Lowther CP, Turner RWD. Reoperation for mitral stenosis. Lancet 1962; 1: 443–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Commerford PJ, Hastie T, Beck W. Closed mitral valvulotomy. Actuarial analysis of results in 654 patients over 12 years and analysis of preoperative predictors of longterm survival. Ann Thorac Surg 1982; 33: 473–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawashima Y, Nakano S, Sato S, Sakai K, Nakatani T, Hiranaka T, Ohnishi K, Hirose H, Matsuda H, Morisaki H, Mori T, Ohyama C, Kitamura S. Reconstructive surgery for acquired valve disease. Jpn Circul J 1982; 46: 407–414.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kawashima Y, Nakano S, Sakai K, Ohyama C, Kitamura S, Mori T, Matsuo H. Long-term results in the patients followed over 5 years after mitral valve surgery. Jpn Circul J 1980; 44: 923–930.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braunwald E, Braunwald NS, Ross J Jr, Morrow AG. Effects of mitral valve replacement on the pulmonary vascular dynamics of patients with pulmonary hypertension. New Engl J Med 1965; 273: 509–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodale F Jr, Sanchez G, Friedlich AL, Scannell JG, Myers GS. Correlation of pulmonary vascular resistance with pulmonary vascular changes in the patients with mitral stenosis before and after valvulotomy. New Eng J Med 1955; 252: 979–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zener JC, Hancock EW, Shumway NA, Harrison DC. Regression of extreme pulmonary hypertension after mitral valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 1972; 30: 820–826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonchek LI. Current status of mitral commissurotomy. Indications, techniques, and results. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52: 411–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakano S, Kitamura S, Ohnishi K, Hirose H, Ohyama C, Ihara K, Kaku K, Kawachi K, Shimazaki Y, Yagihara T, Sato S, Sakai K, Hata S, Kishimoto H, Kawashima Y, Mori T. Hemodynamic response to exercise in the patients with extreme pulmonary hypertension accompanied by mitral stenosis after open mitral commissurotomy. J Jpn Assoc Thorac Surg 1981; 29: 335–341.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Surgical Society 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susumu Nakano
    • 1
  • Hajime Hirose
    • 1
  • Hikaru Matsuda
    • 1
  • Shigeo Sato
    • 1
  • Yasunaru Kawashima
    • 1
  1. 1.First Department of SurgeryOsaka University Medical SchoolOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations