The Japanese journal of surgery

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 238–244 | Cite as

Postoperative assessment of arterial reconstructive surgery using Doppler flow detection

  • Kenichi Koyano
  • Takashi Kamiya
  • Shukichi Sakaguchi


The ankle systolic pressure was measured by the Doppler flow detector during the postoperative course after arterial reconstructive surgery in 61 limbs. The ankle systolic pressure was expressed as a pressure index (PI). There were 2 patterns in the recovery of PI after successful reconstructions. In one of these patterns, PI returned to the normal level within 24 hours. The other group represented a delayed recovery of PI. A comparative study between these 2 groups indicated that the delay in the recovery of PI may be chiefly related to a poor distal run-off. There was no relationship between the recovery pattern of PI and the late patency of reconstructed arteries. On the other hand, follow-up examination by means of the ankle pressure measurement was useful to detect new occurrences of stenotic lesions in the postoperative period.

Key words

doppler ultrasonic flow detection ankle pressure measurement arterial reconstructive surgery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Corson, J.D., Johnson, W.C., LoGerfo, F.W., Bush, H.L.Jr., Menzoian, J.O., Kumaki, D.J. and Nasbeth, D.C.: Doppler ankle systolic blood pressure; prognostic value in vein bypass grafts of the lower extremity, Arch. Surg., 113: 932–935, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodreau, J.J., Bergan, J.J. and Yao, S.T.: Hemodynamic assessment of the patient with severe ischemia by Doppler ultrasound. In Bergan, J.J. and Yao, S.T. (eds.): Gangrene and Severe Ischemia of the Lower Extremities, pp. 85–93, Grune & Stratton, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas, M.H., Quick, C.R.G. and Cotton, L. T.: Doppler ultrasound in the functional assessment of extended deep femoral angioplasty, Br. J. Surg. 64: 368–370, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yao, S.T., Hobbs, J.T. and Irvine, W.T.: Ankle pressure measurement in arterial disease of the Iower extremities, Br. J. Surg. 55: 859–860, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garrett, W.V., Slaymaker, E.E., Heintz, S.E. and Barnes, R.W.: Intraoperative prediction of symptomatic result of aortofemoral bypass from changes in ankle pressure index. Surgery, 82: 504–509, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirai, M. and Sionoya, S.: Segmental blood pressure of the leg and its clinical use, Jpn. J. Surg. 8: 102–110, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siggaard-Andersen, J., Ulrich, J. and Engell, H.C.: Blood pressure measurements on the thigh and on the ankle before and after vascular surgery, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest., suppl. 128: 133–136, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strandness, D.E. Jr. and Bell, J.W.: Peripheral vascular disease; diagnosis and objective evaluation using a mercury strain gauge, Ann. Surg. 161 (suppl.): 1–32, 1965.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sakaguchi, S., Nishibori, F. and Kameda, T.: Thermography, Sohgoh Rinshoh (Clinic Allround) 21: 2617–2627, 1972 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burnham, S.J. and Yao, S.T.: Recovery room monitoring and indications for reoperation. In Bergan, J.J. and Yao, S.T. (ed.): Gangrene and Severe Ischemia of the Lower Extremities, pp. 373–380, Grune & Stratton, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cutler, B.S., Thompson, J.E., Kleinsasser, L.J. and Hempel, G.K.: Autologous saphenous vein femoropopliteal bypass analysis of 298 cases, Surgery 79: 325–331, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis, J.D.: Pressure measurements in the longterm follow up of peripheral vascular disease, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 67: 443–444, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Surgical Society 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenichi Koyano
    • 1
  • Takashi Kamiya
    • 1
  • Shukichi Sakaguchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Second Department of Surgery.Hamamatsu Univ. School of Med.ShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations