Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 295–303 | Cite as

Studies of individual differences as a method for discriminating the stages of acquisition of a conditioned reflex

  • A. V. Savonenko
  • A. V. Danilets
  • K. Zelin'ski
Article

Abstract

Learning of a two-way active avoidance response in a shuttle box, which reflects the establishment of a complex reflex, was characterized by a high level of individual variability for learning measures. Our previous report (Savonenko and Zelin'ski, 1997) showed that rats with different rates of learning have different parameters for the freezing response, demonstrating that the animals' behavior shows a conflicting drive not to enter into the other half of the box. We analyze here the sequence of freezing, avoidance, and escape responses in groups of rats with different rates of learning. The results support the hypothesis that the need to overcome conflict is a separate stage of learning, occurring before the stage at which the avoidance response forms and stabilizes.

Keywords

Avoidance Response Problem Situation Pain Stimulus Active Avoidance Escape Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu. S. Dmitriev and A. A. Bachmanov, “Characteristics of the behavior of rats selected for learning ability,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,42, No. 2, 302 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. A. Zhukov, “The appearance of ‘learned helplessness’ in rats with different active avoidance abilities,”Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova,78, No. 12, 64 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Zelin'ski, “Avoidance: a reflex or a system of reflexes?” in:Tenth Sechenov Readings [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1987), p. 3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Savonenko and K. Zelin'ski, “The relationship between learning of an active avoidance response and overcoming a problem situation in a shuttle box,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,48, No. 2, 229 (1998).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. V. Strekalova, “Characteristics of the defensive behavior of rats according to their resistance to emotional stress,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,45, No. 2, 420 (1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Bignami, “Selection for high rates and low rates of avoidance conditioned in the rat,”Anim. Behav.,13, 221 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Bolles, “Species-specific defence reactions and avoidance learning,”Psychol. Rev.,77, 32 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. C. Bolles, S. A. Moot, and K. Nelson, “Note on the invariance of response latency in shuttlebox avoidance learning,”Learn. Motiv.,7, 108 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. L. Broadhurst and G. Bignami, “Correlative effects of psychogenetic selection: a study of the Roman high and low avoidance strains of rats,”Behav. Res. Therap.,2, 273 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Brush, “On the difference between animals that learn and do not learn to avoid electric shock,”Psychonom. Sci.,5, 123 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Cure and J. P. Rolinat, “Behavioral heterogeneity in Sprague-Dawley rats,”Physiol. Behav.,51, 771 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. F. Maier, R. W. Albin, and T. J. Testa, “Failure to learn to escape in rats previously exposed to inescapable shock depends on nature of escape response,”J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,85, 581 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. A. Modaresi, “One-way characteristic performance of rats under two-way signaled avoidance conditions,”Learn. Motiv.,6, 484 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Y. Nacamura and N. H. Anderson, “Avoidance behavior differences within and between strains of rats,”J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,55, 740 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. B. Overmeir and M. E. P. Seligman, “Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding,”J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,63, 28 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Theios and J. Dunaway, “One-way versus shuttle avoidance conditioning,”Psychonom. Sci.,1, 251 (1964).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Theios, A. D. Lynch, and W. F. Lowe, “Differential effects of shock intensity on one-way and shuttle avoidance conditioning,”J. Exptl. Psychol.,72, 294 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Valzelli and S. Tomasikova, “Difference in learning and retention by albino Swiss mice,”Meth. Find. Exptl. Clin. Pharmacol.,7, 515 (1985).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Zielinski and S. Soltysik, “The effect of pretraining on the acquisition and extinction of avoidance reflex,”Acta Biol. Exper.,24, 73 (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Savonenko
    • 2
  • A. V. Danilets
    • 2
  • K. Zelin'ski
    • 1
  1. 1.Science Research Institute of Mental Health, Tomsk Scientific Center, Siberian DivisionRussian Academy of Medical SciencesTomsk
  2. 2.M. Nencki Institute of Experimental BiologyPolish Academy of SciencesWarsaw

Personalised recommendations