Skip to main content
Log in

Role of the cholinergic system of the neostriatum in regulating several forms of defensive behavior

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies were carried out on the effects of microinjection of carbacholine, a choline receptor agonist, into the dorsal striatum on the discrimination of sensory signals in chronic experiments on dogs with an operant defensive reflex involving maintenance of a flexor pose and in rats trained to a conditioned active escape reflex (CAER) in a T-maze; the sensory signals involved were important in the behavioral situations used. Carbacholine microinjection improved the process of discrimination, with an increase in the number of correct responses in rats in the T-maze discrimination-requiring CAER, and with improvements in responses to differentiation stimuli in the operant defensive reflex requiring maintenance of a defined pose in dogs. The efficiency of the effect dependend on the level of training. There were two situations in which responses did not improve: when there was no signal discrimination in background conditions before microinjection, and in conditions of complete differentiation of the signals, i.e., complete training. It would appear that the neostriatum is not involved in the behavioral reactions in either of these situations, and this may result primarily from low levels of neuronal activity in response to these signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. P. Petropavlovskii “A method for conditioned movement responses,” Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,17, No. 2, 217–225 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. B. Shapovalova, The Role of Cortical and Subcortical Structures in Sensorimotor Integration [in Russian], Leningrad (1978).

  3. K. B. Shapovalova, “A cholinergic mechanism for the neostrial regulation of conditioned reflex alterations of pose in dogs,” Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,74, No. 4, 478–489 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. B. Shapovalova, “Afferent and efferent mechanisms of increases in the cholinergic activity of the neostriatum.” Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova,80, No. 1, 47–59 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. B. Shapovalova and E. V. Pominova, “The involvement of cholinergic systems of the neostriatum in the differentiation of sound signals in dogs,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,41, No. 6, 1163–1176 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. Cole and R. A. Nicoll, “Acetylcholine-mediated slow synaptic potentials in hippocampal pyramidal cells,” Science,221, 1299–1301 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Konig and R. Klippel, The Rat Brain. A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Forebrain and Lower Parts of the Brain Stem, Baltimore (1963).

  8. R. Lim, Ch. Liu and R. Moffit, A Stereotaxis Atlas of the Dog Brain, Springfield (1960).

  9. D. A. McCormick and D. A. Prince, “Mechanisms of action of acetylcholine in the guinea-pig cerebral cortex in vitro,” J. Physiol. (London),375, No. 2, 169–194 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Metherate, N. Trembley, and R. W. Dykes, “Acetylcholine permits long-term enhancement of neuronal responsiveness in cat primary somatosensory cortex,” Neuroscience,22, No. 1, 75–81 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. A. Prado-Alkala, “Is cholinergic activity of the caudate nucleus involved in memory?,” Life Sci.,37, No. 23, 73–95 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Richardson and M. De Long, “A reappraisal of the functions of the nucleus Basalis of Meynert,” Trends Neurosci.,11, No. 6, 264–267 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Schell-Kruger, “New aspects of the functional role of acetylcholine in the basal ganglia. Interaction with other neurotransmitters,” in: Central Cholinergic Mechanisms and Adaptive Dysfunction, M. Singh, et al. (eds.), New York (1985), pp. 105–140.

  14. A. M. Sillito and J. A. Kemp, “Cholinergic modulation of the functional organization of the cat visual cortex,” Brain Res.,289, No. 1, 143–155 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. H. Wainer and M.-M. Mesulam, “Ascending cholinergic pathways in the rat brain,” in: Brain Cholinergic Systems, M. Steriade and D. Biesold (eds.), Oxford-New York (1990), pp. 65–119.

  16. A. Wanquier and G. H. Clinke, “Functions of central cholinergic systems in brain behavior,” in: Central Cholinergic Mechanisms and Adaptive Dysfunctions, M. Singh, et al. (eds.), New York (1985), pp 63–103.

  17. C. D. Woody, B. E. Schwarz, and E. Grues, “Effects of acetylcholine and cyclic GMP on input resistance of cortical neurons in awake cats,” Brain Res.,158, No. 2, 373–395 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences I. M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Translated from Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal im. I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 43–50, April, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapovalova, K.B., Zhuravin, I.A., Pominova, E.V. et al. Role of the cholinergic system of the neostriatum in regulating several forms of defensive behavior. Neurosci Behav Physiol 27, 75–81 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463049

Key words

Navigation