Skip to main content
Log in

Open-ended investigations: Performance and effects of pre-training

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students' performance and the effects of pre-training were studied for tasks rated high in ambiguity, in particular those where the solution to the tasks cannot be arrived at through predictable algorithms. A total of 277 thirteen-year-old students from two urban schools in Singapore were randomly assigned to two groups. One group was provided with instruction for dealing with such tasks in general before performing a series of tasks, while the other group performed the tasks without the instruction. How well the students coped with the ambiguities of the tasks with and without pretraining is reported in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beasley, W. (1985). Improving student laboratory performance: How much practice makes perfect?Science Education, 69(4), 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, E. E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of the consistency in the use of students' conceptual frameworks across different tasks context.Science Education, 70(4), 473–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1987).Assessing investigations at ages 13 and 15. Science report for teachers, No. 9. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work.Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, A. H. (1970).AH4 Group test of general intelligence. London: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and development of reasoning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, R. (1986). Assessment of science practical skills in 15 year olds. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L., & Ford, W. (1981).The psychology of mathematics for instruction. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skurnik, L. S., & Jeffs, P. M. (1970).Science attitude questionnaire. Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains.European Journal of Science Education, 5, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh, K. A. (1990). A study of the factors affecting students' performance in laboratory investigational work. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh, K. A. (1994). Teacher-centred teaching is alive and well.Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh, K. A., & Woolnough, B. E. (1990). Assessing, through reporting, the outcomes of scientific investigations.Educational Research, 32(1), 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh, K. A., & Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Science process skills: Are they generalisable?Research in Science & Technological Education, 12(1), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kok-Aun Toh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toh, KA., Boo, HK. & Keng-Hoe-Yeo Open-ended investigations: Performance and effects of pre-training. Research in Science Education 27, 131–140 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463037

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463037

Keywords

Navigation