Skip to main content
Log in

A study of teacher cognition in planning elementary science lessons

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advances in cognitive psychology and in research techniques have led to an increase in the acceptance of the conception of teaching as a “thoughtful” profession. The interest and enthusiasm of researches in aspects of teacher cognition demonstrate a shift from an emphasis on observable teacher behaviours to a focus on a teacher's unobservable thinking process. In this study, a qualitative approach was used to uncover a teacher's thinking process during lesson planning, to depict a more holistic view of the structural complexity of teacher cognition during lesson planning. Specialised science teachers and general teachers who had different levels of subject expertise were studied. The teachers were interviewed on how they planned an elementary science lesson. Interview protocols were analysed using a taxonomy which assessed the cognitive complexity of teacher thinking. Differences were found between specialised science teachers and general teachers in the levels of structural complexity in their thinking process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berliner, D. C. (1990). The place of process-product research in developing the agenda for research on teacher thinking.Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982).Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Moore, P. J. (1993).Process of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Watkins, D. (1995).Classroom learning: Educational psychology for the Asian teachers. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Livingstone, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (1990). Teachers' thinking about instruction.Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. (1987). Planning and the first year of teaching.Journal of Education for Teaching, 12, 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking.Educational Researcher, 17(2), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock, (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 255–296). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1979a). Teachers' thinking. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.),Research on teaching. (pp. 231–263). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1979b, April).Three studies of teacher planning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

  • Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work.Review of Educational Research, 53, 159–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeler, D. J. (1993). Factors that influence the instructional planning of teachers.Educational Planning, 9(3), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices.Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floden, R. E., & Klinzing, H. G. (1990). What can research on teacher thinking contribute to teacher preparation? A Second Opinion.Educational Researcher, 19(4), 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes Group (1986).Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle.Review of Educational Research, 60, 419–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. B., Wolfson, B. J., & Zaret, E. (1973).Reschooling society: A conceptual model. Washington, DC: Associatiation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary teachers plan? The nature of planning and influences on it.Elementary School Journal, 81, 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M. A. (1981).The identification of intended learning outcomes by early childhood teachers: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, W. T. (1986). Teaching students how to plan: The dominant model and alternatives.Journal of Teacher Education, 37(6), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloth, M. S., Book, C., Putnam, J., & Sivan, E. (1989). Teachers' conceptions of reading, reading instruction, and students' conceptions of reading.Journal of Teacher Education, September/October, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978–1979).Planning and classroom reality: The South Bay Study: Part 4 (Research Series No. 60). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morine-Dershimer, G., & Vallance, E. (1976).Teacher planning (Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study, Special Report C). San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ost, D. H., & Baid, W. E. (1989). Sources of experienced secondary teachers' skill and knowledge: A comparison of science teachers with other teachers.Science Education, 73(10), 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L. (1988). Teachers' and students' cognitional knowledge for classroom teaching and learning.Educational Researcher, 17, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., Marx, R. W., & Clark, C. M. (1978). Teacher planning, teacher behavior and student achievement.American Educational Research Journal, 15, 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (1994). Examining the planning practices of teachers: Reflections on three years of research.Educational Technology, 34(3), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. (1987). Planning. In M. Dunkin (Ed.),International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 483–486). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C., Blakelle, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardo-Brown, D. (1988). Twelve middle school teachers' planning.Elementary School Journal, 89, 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardo-Brown, D. (1990). Experienced teachers' planning practices: A US survey.Journal of Education for Teaching, 16(1), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. K. W., & Watkins, D. (1994). Towards a taxonomy of teacher thinking.Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. H. (1970).How teachers plan their courses. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. (1984). Categories in teacher planning. In R. Halkes & J. K. Olson (Eds.),Teacher thinking: A new perspective on persisting problems in education (pp. 176–186). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1950).Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R. J. (1977).A study of teacher planning: Description and theory development using ethnographic and information processing methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning.Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R. J., & Hendricks-Lee, M. S. (1994). Teacher planning, approaches to. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.),The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 10) (pp. 6031–6035). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahorik, J. A. (1975). Teachers' planning models.Educational Leadership, 33, 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winnie Wing-mui So.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wing-mui So, W. A study of teacher cognition in planning elementary science lessons. Research in Science Education 27, 71–86 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463033

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463033

Keywords

Navigation