Abstract
Laboratory work has always been the most distinctive feature of secondary science teaching and learning. With the increasing emphasis on student centred learning and the importance of developing investigation and problem-solving skills there is value in reflecting on the type of laboratory work that is carried out in the science curriculum. The purpose of this study was to determine the nature of the laboratory work undertaken by lower secondary science students, and in particular, to determine the openness to inquiry of these activities. The study also examined the factors that influence teachers in determining the type of student investigations that occur in the science laboratory. Data from a survey of Perth lower secondary science teachers reveal low levels of inquiry and interesting insights into teacher's perceptions about the benefits of open inquiry for students and the difficulities for teachers. The difficulties identified by teachers represent barriers to change that must be addressed if more open inquiry laboratory work is to be implemented in schools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Academy of Science. (1994).Primary investigations. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (1994).Middle school science and technology. Dubuque, IO: Kendall Hunt.
Curriculum Corporation. (1994a).A national statement on science for Australian schools. Melbourne. Curriculum Corporation.
Curriculum Corporation. (1994b).Science: A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.
Education Department of Western Australia. (1994).Profiles of student achievement 1993: Student performance in science in Western Australian government schools. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.
Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (4), 399–422.
Friedler, Y., & Tamir, P. (1986). Teaching basic concepts of scientific research to high school students.Journal of Biological Education, 20 (4), 263–269.
Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W.. (1995). Refocussing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41 (2), 26–32.
Gay, L. R. (1981).Educational research (2nd ed.), Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (5), 475–499.
Gott, R., Duggan, S., Millar, R., & Lubben, F. (1995). Progression in investigative work in science. In P. Murphy, M. Sellinger, J. Bourne, & M. Briggs (Eds.),Subject learning in the primary curriculum (pp. 184–196). London: Routledge.
Hackling, M. W., & Fairbrother, R. W. (1996). Helping students to do open investigations in science.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42 (4), 26–33.
Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1991). Primary and secondary students' attainment of science investigation skills.Research in Science Education, 21, 161–170.
Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986).Lab work. SET: Research information for teachers, number one. Canberra: Australian Council for Education Research.
Helgeson, S. L. (1994). Research on problem solving: Middle school. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 249–268). New York: Macmillan.
Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry.School Review, 79, 171–212.
Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science.School Science Review, 70, 33–40.
Hofstein, A., Cohen, I., & Lazarowitz, R. (1996). The learning environment of high school students in chemistry and biology laboratories.Research in Science and Technological Education, 14 (1), 103–116.
Lunetta, V., & Tamir, P. (1979). Matching lab activities with teaching goals.Science Teacher 46 (5), 22–24.
Mayer, E. (1992).Putting general education to work: The key competencies report. Canberra: Australian Education Council.
National Academy of Sciences & National Research Council. (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
School Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (1994).The national curriculum orders for England. London: SCAA.
Skinner, R. (1994). Creative technology projects in science: The CREST model.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 40 (4), 26–30.
Tamir, P. (1989). Training teachers to teach effectively in the laboratory.Science Education, 73, 59–69.
Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1978). An analysis of laboratory activities in BSCS yellow version.American Biology Teacher, 40 (6), 353–357.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978),Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watson, R., & Fairbrother, B. (1993). Open-ended work in science (OPENS) project: Managing investigations in the laboratory.School Science Review, 75 (271), 31–38.
Watts, M. (1991).The science of problem-solving: A practical guide for science teachers. London: Cassell.
Woolnough, B., & Allsop, T. (1985).Practical work in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Staer, H., Goodrum, D. & Hackling, M. High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education 28, 219–228 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462906
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462906