, Volume 30, Issue 4–5, pp 310–315 | Cite as

Conditions of dominant effectiveness of distal sites of active uniform dendrites with distributed tonic inputs

  • S. M. Korogod
  • I. B. Kulagina
Poster Communications


This simulation study aimed at assessing linkage between the membrane properties and the effectiveness of somatopetal current transfer from activated tonic excitatory inputs homogeneously distributed along uniform dendrites. It was shown that in the dendrites having anN-shaped steady current-voltage membrane characteristic due to the negative slope within a certain range of potentials, distal sites can be more effective than proximal sites in somatopetal current transfer from tonically activated excitatory synaptic inputs. Inhomogeneous dendritic depolarization produced by these inputs should be found everywhere within a range of the negative slope. In simulated dendrites receiving, as in rat abducens motoneurons, voltage-sensitive synaptic inputs of anN-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type, such spatial effects occurred at low depolarization produced by subcritical excitation. At supercritical excitation, depolarization increased and left the range of the negative slope, and proximal sites became much more effective than distal ones. It is suggested that persistent inward currents (including other than of NMDA nature) can provide similar effects.


Distal Dendrite Dendritic Membrane Active Dendrite Unit Path Length Path Profile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Johnston, J. C. Magee, C. M. Colbert, et al., “Active properties of neuronal dendrites,”Annu. Rev. Neurosci.,19, 165–186 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Granit, D. Kernell, and Y. Lamarre, “Algebraic summation in synaptic activation of motoneurones firing within the ‘primary range’ to injected currents,”J. Physiol.,187, 379–399 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. K. Powers, F. R. Robinson, M. A. Konodi, et al., “Effective synaptic current can be estimated from measurements of neuronal discharge,”J. Neurophysiol.,68, 964–968 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Bernander, C. Koch, and R. J. Douglas, “Amplification and linearization of distal synaptic input to cortical pyramidal cells,”J. Neurophysiol.,72, 2743–2753 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. K. Powers and M. D. Binder, “Effective synaptic current and motoneuron firing rate modulation,”J. Neurophysiol.,74, No. 2, 793–801 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. C. Schwindt and W. E. Crill, “Equivalence of amplified current flowing from dendrite to soma measured by alteration of repetitive firing and by voltage clamp in layer 5 pyramidal neurons,”J. Neurophysiol.,75, 3731–3739 (1996).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Koch, “Cable theory in neurons with active, linearized membranes,”Biol. Cybern.,50, 15–33 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. A. Bloomfield, “Relationship between receptive and dendritic field size of amacrine cells in the retina,”J. Neurophysiol.,68, 711–725 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. N. Barrett and W. E. Crill, “Influence of dendritic location and membrane properties on the effectiveness of synapses on cat motoneurones,”J. Physiol.,293, No. 1, 325–345 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Bras, P. Gogan, and S. Tyč-Dumont, “The dendrites of single brain stem motoneurones intracellularly labelled with HRP in the cat. Morphological and electrophysiological differences,”Neuroscience,22, 947–970 (1987).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. M. Korogod, H. Bras, V. N. Sarana, et al., “Electrotonic clusters in the dendritic arborization of abducens motoneurons of the rat,”Eur. J. Neurosci.,6, No. 11, 1517–1527 (1994).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. M. Korogod, “Electro-geometrical coupling in non-uniform branching dendrites: consequences for relative synaptic effectiveness,”Biol. Cybern.,74, No. 1, 85–93 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. M. Korogod and I. B. Kulagina, “Geometry induced features of current transfer in neuronal dendrites with tonically activated conductances,”Biol. Cybern.,79(3), 231–240 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. C. Schwindt and W. E. Crill, “Amplification of synaptic current by persistent sodium conductance in apical dendrite of neocortical neurons,”J. Neurophysiol.,74, 2220–2224 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Brodin, H. G. C. Traven, A. Lansner, et al., “Computer simulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor induced membrane properties in a neuron model,”J. Neurophysiol.,66, 473–484 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Hines, “NEURON—A program for simulation of nerve equations,” in:Neural Systems: Analysis and Modeling, F. Eeckman (ed.), Kluwer Acad. Publ., Norwell MA (1993), pp. 127–136.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. M. Gutman, “Bistability of dendrites,”Int. J. Neural Syst.,1, 291–304 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.-A. Lagerback, “An ultrastructural study of cat lumbosacral γ-motoneurons after retrograde labelling with horseradish peroxidase,”J. Comp. Neurol.,240, 256–264 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O. P. Ottersen and A. S. Landsend, “Organization of glutamate receptors at the synapse,”Eur. J. Neurosci.,9, 2219–2224 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. G. Cull-Candy, M. Farrant, and D. Feldmeyer, “NMDA channel conductance: a user's guide,” in:Excitatory Amino Acids and Synaptic Transmission, H. V. Wheal and A. M. Thomson (eds.), Acad. Press, London (1995), pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. A. Flatman, P. C. Schwindt, and W. E. Crill, “The induction and modification of voltage-sensitive responses in the cat neocortical neurons by N-methyl-D-aspartate,”Brain Res.,363, 62–77 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Durand, “Synaptic excitation triggers oscillations during NMDA receptor activation in rat abducens motoneurons,”Eur. J. Neurosci.,5, 1389–1397 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Lipowsky, T. Gillessen, and C. Alzheimer, “Dendritic Na+ channels amplify EPSPs in hippocampalCA1 pyramidal cells,”J. Neurophysiol.,76, 2181–2191 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. H. Lee and C. J. Heckman, “Influence of voltage-sensitive dendritic conductances on bistable firing effective synaptic current in cat spinal motoneuronsin vivo,”J. Neurophysiol.,76, 2107–2110 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Hounsgaard and O. Kiehn, “Calcium spikes and calcium plateaux evoked by differential polarization in dendrites of turtle motoneuronsin vitro,”J. Physiol.,468, 245–259 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Korogod
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. B. Kulagina
    • 2
  1. 1.Dnepropetrovsk Division of International Center for Molecular PhysiologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineUkraine
  2. 2.Dnepropetrovsk State UniversityUkraine

Personalised recommendations