Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 174–182 | Cite as

Contrasting of synaptic signals by simultaneous modification of excitatory and inhibitory inputs

  • G. B. Murzina
  • I. G. Sil'kis


Conditions facilitating long-term contrasting of interneuronal connections were studied using a mathematical model of posttetanic Ca2+-dependent postsynaptic processes in pyramidal neurons of hippocampal field CA3. These studies demonstrated that modified inhibition selectively facilitates long-term potentiation of the efficiency of one of the interneuronal connections when the presynaptic neuron discharges at a given frequency for a short time, while connections formed from the same postsynaptic cell with other presynaptic neurons undergo long-term depression. The mechanism underlying this contrasting may involve long-term depression of the efficiency of disynaptic inhibitory transmission to the rhythmically stimulated input, even when the efficiency of monosynaptic excitatory transmission at the same input is low and undergoes minimal potentiation. When the “common” inhibitory neuron is simultaneously activated by various presynaptic cells, heterosynaptic potentiation of inhibitory transmission can simultaneously develop at the other inputs of the postsynaptic cell, without change in the efficiency of excitatory transmission, which leads to long-term depression of the efficiency of the connections between other excitatory neurons and the postsynaptic cell.


Dendritic Spine Inhibitory Neuron Excitatory Input Inhibitory Input Presynaptic Neuron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. B. Murzina and I. G. Sil'kis, “Mathematical modeling of Ca2+-dependent postsynaptic processes in the hippocampus (induction of long-term potentiation and depression),” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,46, No. 4, 674 (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. B. Murzina and I. G. Sil'kis, “Studies of long-term potentiation and depression of inhibitory transmission by mathematical modeling of postsynaptic processes,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,46, No. 5, 917 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. G. Sil'kis, “On inhibitory interactions in neuronal networks including cells of the auditory cortex and the medial geniculate body,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,44, No. 6, 1046 (1994).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. G. Sil'kis, “Long-term changes in the efficiency of excitatory synaptic transmission in thalamocortical networks, induced by stimulation of the neocortex,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,45, No. 2, 321 (1994).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. G. Sil'kis, “Long-term changes in the efficiency of inhibitory transmission in thalamocortical neuronal networks, induced by cortical microstimulation,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,45, No. 3, 538 (1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. G. Sil'kis, “Long-term changes in the efficiency of excitatory and inhibitory connections in neuronal micronetworks of the motor cortex, induced by tetanization of thalamic nuclei and the sensory cortex,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,45, No. 5, 932 (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. G. Sil'kis, “Simultaneous activation of excitatory and inhibitory inputs as a condition for the induction of homo-, hetero-, and associative long-term depression of excitation,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,45, No. 6, 1149 (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Bava, F. Cicirata, R. Guiffrida et al., “Electrophysiologic properties and nature of ventrolateral thalamic nucleus neurons reactive to converging inputs of paleo- and neocerebellar origin,” Exp. Neurol.,91, No. 1, 1 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Cauller and B. W. Connors, “Synaptic physiology of horizontal afferents to layer I in slices of rat SI neocortex,” J. Neurosci.,14, No. 2, 751 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. A. Desai and P. J. Conn, “Excitatory effects of ACPD receptor activation in the hippocampus are mediated by direct effects on pyramidal cells and blockade of synaptic inhibition,” J. Neurophysiol.,66, No. 1, 40 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.-M. Edeline, “Frequency-specific plasticity of single unit discharges in the rat medial geniculate body,” Brain Res.,529, No. 1, 109 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. O. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior, Wiley, New York (1949).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Koch and A. Zador, “The function of dendritic spines: devices subserving biochemical rather than electrical compartmentalization,” J. Neurosci.,13, No. 2, 413 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Komatsu, “Use-dependent long-term potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat visual cortex,” J. Neurosci.,14, No. 1, Part 1, 6488 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. J. Linden, “Long-term synaptic depression of the mammalian brain,” Neuron,12, No. 3, 457 (1994).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    X. Liu, Z. Zheng, M. Xi, and C. Wu, “Direct synaptic linkage of ventrolateral nucleus of thalamus terminal with cat fast pyramidal tract neuron,” Brain Res.,362, No. 1, 189 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. B. Liu, J. E. Disterhoft, and N. T. Slater, “Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors, induces long-term depression of GABAergic inhibition in hippocampus,” J. Neurophysiol.,69, No. 6, 1000 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Miles, “Synaptic excitation of inhibitory cells by single CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cells of the guinea pigin vitro,” J. Physiol.,428, 61 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    U. Misgeldt, J. M. Sarbey, and M. R. Klee, “Heterosynaptic postactivation potentiation in hippocampal CA3 neurons. Long-term changes of the postsynaptic potentials,” Exp. Brain Res.,37, No. 2, 217 (1979).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. B. Murzina and I. G. Silkis, “Biophysical model of posttetanic processes underlying simultaneous long-term modifications (LTP, LTD) in the efficacy of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the dendritic spine,” in: The Second International Symposium on Neuroinformatics and Neurocomputers, Rostov-on-Don, Russia (1995), p. 121.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. S. Ramoa and D. A. McCormic, “Enhanced activation of NMDA receptor responses at the immature retinogeniculate synapses,” J. Neurosci.,14, No. 4, 2058 (1994).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. G. Silkis, “New modification rules for neural networks with excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections,” in: The Second International Symposium on Neuroinformatics and Neurocomputers, Rostov-on-Don, Russia (1995), p. 129.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    I. G. Silkis, “Activation of GABAb receptors, reduction of intracellular concentration of Ca++, and inhibition of protein kinase are possible mechanisms of long-term possttetanic modification of the efficacy of inhibitory transmission in the new cortex,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol.,26, No. 1, 80 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. K. Stevens and G. L. Gerstein, “Interactions between cat lateral geniculate neurons,” J. Neurophysiol.,39, No. 2, 309 (1976).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. V. Szente, A. Buranyi, and C. D. Woody, “Effects of protein kinase C inhibitor H-7 on membrane properties and synaptic responses of neocortical neurons of awake cats,” Brain Res.,506, 281 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. A. Turner, “Feed-forward inhibitory potentials and excitatory interactions in guinea-pig hippocampal pyramidal cells,” J. Physiol.,422, 333 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. R. Wickens and W. C. Abraham, “The involvement of L-type calcium channels in heterosynaptic long-term depression in the hippocampus,” Neurosci. Lett.,130, No. 1, 128 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. B. Murzina
  • I. G. Sil'kis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations