Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the effects of dopamine agonists on self-stimulation of the hypothalamus with lesioning of mesolimbic brain structures in rats reared in conditions of social isolation

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Initial and phenamine-stimulated frequencies of self-stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus were not significantly different in rats reared in communities and in conditions of social isolation. Unilateral lesioning of the ventral tegmental area and the medial prefrontal cortex in early ontogenesis increased phenamine sensitivity only in isolated rats. The dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine, at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg, which affects presynaptic receptors, inhibited the self-stimulation response in intact group-reared animals and in rats reared in isolation, by 21–23%. Stimulation of the ventral tegmental area did not change, while stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex doubled the sensitivity of rats to apomorphine in animals reared in isolation (at doses of 0.05 and 0.5 mg/kg). Conditions of partial sensory and complete species isolation resulted in the development of a state of presynaptic receptor hypersensitivity of dopamine receptors in mesocorticolimbic brain systems in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. A. Vartanyan and E. S. Petrov, Emotion and Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. V. Komissarov, Mechanisms of the Chemical Sensitivity of Synaptic Membranes [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Lebedev, The Effects of Individual Experience in Early Ontogenesis on the Formation of Reinforcing Systems in the Rat Brain, Author's Abstract of Thesis for Doctorate in Biological Sciences [in Russian], IÉM, Leningrad (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Lebedev and P. D. Shabanov, “Comparison of the self-stimulation response and conditioned place preference on administration of phenamine in rats,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,42, No. 4, 692 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Bjorkound and T. Hokfelt, Classical Transmitters in the CNS, Elsevier, Oxford-Amsterdam-New York (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Chitkara, M. D. Durcar, and I. C. Campbell, “Apomorphine-induced stereotypy: function of age and rearing environment,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.,21, 671 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Dichozkova, I. Krejci, Z. Hlinak, et al., “Biochemical and behavioral effects of alaptide, a spirocyclic dipeptide derived from Pre-Leu-Gly-NH2,” Activ. Nerv. Super.,31, 71 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Guisado, P. Fernandez-Tome, J. Carron, and J. Del Rio, “Increased receptor binding in the striatum of rats after long-term isolation,” Eur. J. Pharmacol.,65, 463 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. H. Jones, T. D. Hernandez, C. A. Marsden, and T. W. Robbins, “Enhanced striatal response to d-amphetamine as revealed by intracerebral dialysis following social isolation in rats,” Brit. J. Pharmacol.,94, 345 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. H. Jones, C. A. Marsden, and T. W. Robbins, “Increased sensitivity to apomorphine of a reward related stimuli following social isolation in rats: possible disruption of dopamine-dependent mechanisms of the nucleus accumbens,” Psychopharmacol.,102, 364 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. P. H. Kelly and D. C. Roberts, “Effects of amphetamine and apomorphine on locomotor activity after 6-OHDA and electrolytic lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi,” Pharmacol. Biochem Behav.,19, 137 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. F. R. Konig and A. A. Klippel, “A stereotaxic atlas of the forebrain and lower parts of the brain stem,” Baltimore (1963).

  13. I. Krejci, E. Kasafirek, N. A. Tushmalova, et al., “Behavioral effects of alaptide, a spirocyclic dipeptide derived from melanostatine,” Neuropeptides,24, 230 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Le Moal and H. Simon, “Dopamine and behavior,” Psychopharmacol.,101, 33 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Le Moal and H. Simon, “Mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic network: functional and regulatory roles,” Physiol Rev.,71, 155 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. F. S. Radhakishum, G. Wolterink, and J. M. Van Ree, “The response of apomorphine, administered into the accumbens in rats with bilateral lesions of the nucleus accumbens, induced with 6-OHDA,” Neuropharmacol,27, 1111 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. V. Rebec, “Electrophysiological pharmacology of amphetamine,” in Neurobiology of Drug Abuse, M. Cohen (ed.), Karger, New York (1987), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. S. Sapronov, A. A. Lebedev, I. D. Djulakidze, and P. D. Shabanov, “Imbalance of hypophyseal hormones, self-stimulation and place preference test in rats,” CEPNESP Bull.,1, 14 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. D. Shabanov, I. V. Loseva, I. D. Djulakidze, and A. A. Lebedev, “Behavioral effects of alaptide, a new melanostatine analogue, under lesions of mesocorticolimbic structures,” Neuropsychopharmacol.,9, 161 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. J. Shaefer and R. P. Michael, “Schedule-controlled brain stimulation—has it utility for behavioral pharmacology?,” Neurosci. Behav. Rev.,16, 569 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. R. Stellar, F. S. Hall, and M. Waraczynski, “The effects of excitotoxin lesions of the lateral hypothalamus on self-stimulation reward,” Brain Res.,541, 29 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. R. Stellar and E. Stellar, The Neurobiology of Motivation and Reward, Springer, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Yeomans, “Mechanisms of brain stimulation reward,” Progr. In Psychobiol. and Physiol. Psychol., A. N. Epstein, et al. (eds.) Vol. 13, Academic Press, San Diego (1989), p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Institute of Experimental Medicine, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, St. Petersburg. Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel'nosti, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 937–943, September–October, 1996.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panchenko, G.N., Lebedev, A.A. & Shabanov, P.D. Comparison of the effects of dopamine agonists on self-stimulation of the hypothalamus with lesioning of mesolimbic brain structures in rats reared in conditions of social isolation. Neurosci Behav Physiol 28, 130–135 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461958

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461958

Keywords

Navigation