Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 708–713 | Cite as

Responses of constantly firing motor units to afferent stimulation

  • I. N. Pleshchinskii
  • T. V. Babynina
  • N. L. Alekseeva
  • V. F. Klimova
  • S. G. Perminova


Constantly firing motor units of the short abductor muscles of the first finger in the human hand and the abdominal wall muscle in immobilized rats responded to afferent stimulation of the median and sciatic nerves respectively with changes in the nature of spike activity. In the first 250 msec of the post-stimulus period, the frequency of motor unit spike activity became unstable and peri-stimulus histograms were individually quite distinct. This was followed by relative stabilization of motor unit discharge frequencies, and the subsequently (750 msec) determined motor unit spike frequency depended on most cases on the background spike frequency.

Key words

Motor unit motoneuron afferent stimulation spike frequency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. P. Kudina, “Testing the excitability of a spiking motoneuron in humans in the interspike interval,” Neirofiziologiya,19, 210–216 (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. P. Kudina and L. I. Chirikova, “The frequency ratio of discharges of a spiking motoneuron and the efficiency of excitatory stimulation of 1-a afferents in humans,” Neirofiziologiya,19, 595–600 (1987).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Ashby and D. Zilm, “Characteristics of postsynaptic potentials produced in single human motoneurons by homonymous group,” Vollys. Exp. Brain Res.,47, 41–48 (1982).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. A. Conway, H. Hultborn, O. Kiehn, and I. Miutz, “Plateau potentials in a-motoneurons induced by intravenous injection of L-DOPA and clonidine in the spinal cat,” J. Physiol. (London),405, 369–384 (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Eken and O. Kiehn, “Bistable firing properties of soleus motor units in unrestrained rats,” Acta Physiol. Scand.,136, 383–394 (1989).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Hounsgaard, H. Hultborn, B. Jespersen, O. Kiehn, “Intrinsic membrane properties causing a bistable behaviour ofa-motoneurons,” Exp. Brain Res.,55, 391–394 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Hounsgaard, H. Hultborn, B. Jespersen, and O. Kiehn, “Bistability ofa-motoneurons in the decerebrate cat after intravenous 5-hydroxytryptophan,” J. Physiol. (London),405, 345–367 (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. P. Judina and L. I. Churikova, “Excitability of firing motoneurons tested by Ia afferent volleys in human triceps surae,” EEG Clin. Neurophys.,69, 576–580 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. S. Miles and K. S. Turker, “Decomposition of the human electromyogram in inhibitory reflex,” Exp. Brain Res.65, 337–342 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. S. Miles and K. S. Turker, “Biphasic inhibitory responses and their IPSPs, evoked by tibial nerve stimulation in human soleus,” Exp. Brain Res.,74, 637–645 (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Schwindt and W. Crill, “Role of a persistent inward current in motoneuron bursting during spinal seizures,” J. Neurophysiol.,43, 1296–1318 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. N. Pleshchinskii
  • T. V. Babynina
  • N. L. Alekseeva
  • V. F. Klimova
  • S. G. Perminova

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations