Abstract
In this paper, we illustrate the use of auto/biographical materials as part of a research process concerned with problematic aspects of learning science. Drawing on an extended study of graphing among university students and research scientists, and on the auto/biographical of and interview data with one of the authors, we point out some of the sources of difficulties of coming to understand graphs and graphing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bastide, F. (1990). The iconography of scientific texts: Principles of analysis. In M. Lynch, & S. Woolgar (Eds.),Representation in scientific practice (pp. 187–229). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992).An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W.-M. (1998). Lecturing graphing: What features of lectures contribute to student difficulties in learning to interpret graphs?Research in Science Education, 28, 77–90.
Eco, U. (1984).Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967).Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Geertz, C. (1973).The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Latour, B. (1987).Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Latour, B. (1993).La clef de Berlin et autres leçons d'un amateur de sciences [The key to Berlin and other lessons of a science lover]. Paris: Éditions la Découverte.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching.Review of Educational Research, 60, 1–64.
Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.),Reading science (pp. 87–113), London, Routledge.
Neumann, A. (1998). On experience, memory, and knowing: A post-holocaust (auto)biography.Curriculum Inquiry, 28, 425–442.
Ricklefs, R. E. (1990).Ecology (3rd ed.), New York: Freeman.
Ricœur, P. (1991).From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Roth, W.-M. (1996). Where is the context in contextual word problems?: Mathematical practices and products in Grade 8 students' answers to story problems.Cognition and Instruction, 14, 487–527.
Roth, W.-M. (1998). Unspecified things, signs, and ‘natural objects’: Towards a phenomenological hermeneutic of graphing. In S. B. Berenson, K. R. Dawson, M. Blanton, W. N. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood, & L. Stiff (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 291–297) Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearninghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999a). Complexities of graphical representations during lectures: A phenomenological approach.Learning and Instruction, 9, 235–255.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999b). Of cannibals, missionaries, and converts: graphing competencies from grade 8 to professional science inside (classrooms) and outside (field/laboratory).Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24, 179–212.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (in press). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
Roth, W.-M., Masciotra, D., & Bowen, G. M. (1998, October).From thing to sign and ‘natural object’: Toward a genetic phenomenology of graph interpretation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Halifax, NS.
Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1997). Graphing: A cognitive ability or cultural practice?Science Education, 81, 91–106.
Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: A social practice approach to “representations.”Review of Educational Research, 68, 35–59.
Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 977–1019.
Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., & Bowen, G. M. (1998). How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 25–48.
Sharrock, W., & Button, G. (1991). The social actor: Social action in real time. In G. Button (Ed.),Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 137–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roth, WM., Bowen, G.M. Learning difficulties related to graphing: A hermeneutic phenomenological perspective. Research in Science Education 30, 123–139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461657
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461657