Skip to main content
Log in

Autobiography and the paradox of change: (Dis)locating ourselves in the process

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As researchers, we often seek to change science education practices that have become outdated. Throughout such change processes we are faced with the dilemma of embodying relationships of power or discourse that we are trying to transform. A situated cognition framework would suggest that this conundrum is inevitable because a community of practitioners is fundamentally bound by the institution and its resources, concerns and ways of being. If we cannot step outside the institution we are trying to change how can we change something which defines who we, as agents of change, are? We reframe the issue as one of cultural production, where we locate ourselves within a cultural field, struggling to change it. This paper embodies some of the tensions involved in cultural re/production of science education. These tensions are played out both in our autobiographical accounts that are part of this article and in the relationship of the authors as graduate student and supervisor. Through a conversational hermeneutic analysis of the authors' autobiographical writings, we examine some of the salient features of bringing about change in science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989).Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, M. (1989).The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C. (1998). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty.Educational Policy, 12, 525–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C., & Roth, W. M. (1999).On agency in science education. Submitted.

  • Bateson, G. (1972).Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1982).Leçon sur la leçon. Paris: Editions de Minuit. (Translated in 1990 as part ofIn other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992).An invitation to reflexive sociology, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning.Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, K., Hink, W., & Roth, W.-M. (1980). Stopping power for He+ (20–120 keV).Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 173, 357–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1985).The ear of the other. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1998).Monolingualism of the other; or, The prosthesis of origin, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1990). Adolescent social categories-information and science learning. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.),Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 203–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., & Finkel, E. (1998).Women's science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourez, G. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy as a social practice.Social Studies of Science, 27, 903–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1975).Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1994). Cultural studies.Harvard Educational Review, 64, 278–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991).Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1990). Views of the Classroom: Implications for math and science learning research. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.),Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 251–264), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. H., & Roth, W.-M. (1999) Learning science in the community.In Science as/for sociopolitical action. Forthcoming.

  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1992).Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, P. (1996). Beneath a modern sky: Space technology and its place on the ground.Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21, 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1991).From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1995).Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (Eds.) (in preparation).Science education as/for sociopolitical action.

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. H. (1999). Breaking the spell: Science education for a free society. In W.-M. Roth, & J. Désautels (Eds.),Science education as/for sociopolitical action. In preparation.

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1997). Deinstitutionalising school science: Implications of a strong view of situated cognition.Research in Science Education, 27, 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). >unDELETE science education: /lives/work/voices.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, D. (1980).Man made language. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1991a). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.),A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 26–56). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1991b). The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss. In D. R. Maines (Ed.),Social organisation and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 265–283). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1999).Reproduction of social class in the teaching and learning of science in urban high schools. Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, Mass.

  • Tobin, K., Seiler, G., & Smith, M. (1999). Educating science teachers for the sociocultural diversity of urban schools.Research in Science Education, 29(1), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Roth, WM. Autobiography and the paradox of change: (Dis)locating ourselves in the process. Research in Science Education 30, 57–73 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461653

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461653

Keywords

Navigation