Skip to main content
Log in

Autobiography in science education: Greater objectivity through local knowledge

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In our paper we argue that (1) autobiography ought to be considered both the telling of one's story and the using of that story with others to understand and use difference productively, and (2) autobiography (as telling and interacting) dismantles the universalistic tug of science and replaces it with a push for science as local knowledge. To accomplish this dual task, we share selective autobiographical accounts of lives (autobiography as telling), and then use these accounts to have a conversation about urban science education (autobiography as interacting). Following these autobiographical accounts we then discuss how our different stories apart and together provide a greater objective insight into what it means to come-to-know science.

When talking about their lives, people lie sometimes, forget a lot, exaggerate, become confused, and get things wrong. Yet, they are revealing truths. These truths don't reveal the past “as it actually was,” aspiring to a standard of objectivity. They give us instead the truths of our experiences. (Personal Narratives Group (PNG), 1989, p. 261)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989).Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993).Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1994).Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, M. (1989).The reflexive thesis: Writing sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C. (1998).Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C., & Osborne, M. (1999).Science for social action: Transforming the harsh world. Submitted.

  • Britzman, D. (1986). Cultural myths and the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure.Harvard Education Review, 56, 442–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpit, L. (1988) The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children.Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1960).Pattern and meaning in history. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosa, S. (1992). Authoring the educated self: Educational autobiography and resistance.Educational Theory, 42, 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1991).Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Redrawing educational boundaries. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1978/1994) The lived world. In L. Stone (Ed.),The education feminism reader (pp. 17–25). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997).Modest witness@second-millennium. Female man-meets-oncomouse: Feminisms and technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991).Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1994).Teaching to transgress. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1985).Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Personal Narratives Group. (1989).Interpreting women's lives: Feminist theory and personal narratives. Bloomington, IN: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. (1987).Narrative, knowing and the human sciences. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, E. (1990). Travels in the postmodern: Making sense of the local. In L. Nicholson (Ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. 176–189). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1979).On lies, secrets and silence. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist perspective.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, C. (1986).Landscape for a good woman: A story of two lives. London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, S. (1988).Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. 1977.Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1988).Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Calabrese Barton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barton, A.C., Darkside Autobiography in science education: Greater objectivity through local knowledge. Research in Science Education 30, 23–42 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461651

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461651

Keywords

Navigation