Abstract
In our paper we argue that (1) autobiography ought to be considered both the telling of one's story and the using of that story with others to understand and use difference productively, and (2) autobiography (as telling and interacting) dismantles the universalistic tug of science and replaces it with a push for science as local knowledge. To accomplish this dual task, we share selective autobiographical accounts of lives (autobiography as telling), and then use these accounts to have a conversation about urban science education (autobiography as interacting). Following these autobiographical accounts we then discuss how our different stories apart and together provide a greater objective insight into what it means to come-to-know science.
When talking about their lives, people lie sometimes, forget a lot, exaggerate, become confused, and get things wrong. Yet, they are revealing truths. These truths don't reveal the past “as it actually was,” aspiring to a standard of objectivity. They give us instead the truths of our experiences. (Personal Narratives Group (PNG), 1989, p. 261)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989).Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993).Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Apple, M. (1994).Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.
Ashmore, M. (1989).The reflexive thesis: Writing sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barton, A. C. (1998).Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Barton, A. C., & Osborne, M. (1999).Science for social action: Transforming the harsh world. Submitted.
Britzman, D. (1986). Cultural myths and the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure.Harvard Education Review, 56, 442–456.
Delpit, L. (1988) The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children.Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.
Dilthey, W. (1960).Pattern and meaning in history. New York: Harper and Row.
Franzosa, S. (1992). Authoring the educated self: Educational autobiography and resistance.Educational Theory, 42, 395–412.
Giroux, H. (1991).Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Redrawing educational boundaries. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Greene, M. (1978/1994) The lived world. In L. Stone (Ed.),The education feminism reader (pp. 17–25). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (1997).Modest witness@second-millennium. Female man-meets-oncomouse: Feminisms and technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Harding, S. (1991).Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
hooks, b. (1994).Teaching to transgress. New York: Routledge.
Keller, E. F. (1985).Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Personal Narratives Group. (1989).Interpreting women's lives: Feminist theory and personal narratives. Bloomington, IN: University Press.
Polkinghorne, D. (1987).Narrative, knowing and the human sciences. New York: SUNY Press.
Probyn, E. (1990). Travels in the postmodern: Making sense of the local. In L. Nicholson (Ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. 176–189). New York: Routledge.
Rich, A. (1979).On lies, secrets and silence. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist perspective.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897–930.
Steedman, C. (1986).Landscape for a good woman: A story of two lives. London: Virago Press.
Traweek, S. (1988).Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Willis, P. 1977.Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
Woolgar, S. (1988).Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barton, A.C., Darkside Autobiography in science education: Greater objectivity through local knowledge. Research in Science Education 30, 23–42 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461651
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461651