Abstract
This study focuses on the efforts of a small group of undergraduate engineering students as they explore their perceptions of their learning environment generally, and their approaches to learning in a specific engineering subject. A case study methodlogy is used, and my role of teacher as researcher is described and contextualised as I work with my students in weekly meetings outside their classrooms. Issues of cognition and affect emerge as we negotiate and develop a process where the students act as observers in their own classrooms. Observers' reports to weekly group meetings provide a framework to challenge individual students' assumptions about their learning approaches, and to explore enhanced metacognition. The nature of learning in engineering as a complex interaction of problematic issues is evidenced through this observation and reporting process. Implications for other learning contexts are considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnott, S. (1993).An evaluation of the first year Solid Mechanics course. Unpublished report, Engineering Faculty, Swinburne University, Melbourne.
Arnott, S., & Edwards, T. (1997).Progression and retention rates in first year engineering and science: Strategies for improvement. Unpublished report, Swinburne University, Melbourne.
Arnott, S., Edwards, T., & Macdonald, I. (1997). First year teaching: A good learning environment.Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Ballarat, Australia, 320–324.
Arnott, S., & Lewis, S. (1992). The Swinburne Engineering Education Development Project: Academic Staff Development.Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Brisbane, Australia. 99–104.
Association of Professional Engineers and Scientists Australia. (1992).Skills for the Future— Engineers and Scientists Achieving Enterprise Performance; Report by the Consultants on the Skills Enhancement Project. Melbourne: APESA, DEET, IEAust.
Baird, J., R. (1984).Improving learning through enhanced metacognition. Unpublished PhD thesis. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Baird, J. R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful inquiry and conceptual change. In E. Hegarty-Hazel, E. (Ed.),The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 183–200). London: Routledge.
Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (Eds.) (1992).Learning from the PEEL experience. The Monash University Printing Services, Melbourne, Victoria.
Fullan, M. G. (1991).The new meaning of educational change. Ontario, Canada: Teacher College Press.
Gunstone, R. F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, & R. T. White (Eds.).The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 131–160). London: The Falmer Press.
Gunstone, R. F. (1996). International developments in improving the science and mathematics curriculum—Understanding and supporting changes in the classroom. In C. Stoll, L. de Feiter, H. Vonk, & J. van den Akker (Eds.),Improving science and mathematics teaching in Southern Africa: Effectiveness of interventions (pp. 60–68). Amsterdam, Holland: VU University Press.
Institution of Engineers Australia. (1996).Changing the culture: Engineering education into the future. (Review Report). Canberra, ACT: IEAust.
Lloyd, B., Rice, M., Roebuck, W., & Stokes, E. (EPM Consulting Group) (1989).New pathways in engineering education. Melbourne, Victoria: Histec Publications.
Macdonald, I., & Arnott, S. (1998). Building teaching communities in first year Engineering.Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Gladstone, Australia. 283–287.
Macdonald, I., & Arnott, S. (1999). Redesigning first year Engineering: A teaching community approach.Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Adelaide, Australia. 98–103.
Moses, I. & Trigwell, K. (1993).Teaching quality and quality of learning in professional courses. Canberra, ACT: Australia Government Printing Service.
Ramsden, P. (1992).Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E., & Clark, S. (1995).Recognising and rewarding good teaching in Australian higher education. A project commissioned by the Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching.
Ramsden, V., Schooling, P., Law, N., & McKenzie, J. (1991).A survey to identify factors influencing students' completion of undergraduate degree courses in electrical engineering. Sydney, NSW: School of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology.
Sarason, S. B. (1991).The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Searle, P. (1986).A study of the circular motion concepts held by college level engineering students. Unpublished M. App. Sc. thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
Searle, P., & Gunstone, R. F. (1990, April).Conceptual change and physics instruction: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, USA.
Tobin, K. (1999). Teachers as researchers and researchers as teachers.Research in Science Education, 29(1), 1–3.
White, R. T. (1988).Learning science: Oxford: Blackwell.
White, R. T. (1989) Metacognition. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.),The international encyclopedia of education (Suppl. Vol. 1, pp. 503–508). Oxford: Permagon.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992).Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Williams, B. (1988).Review of the discipline of Engineering. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Printing Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnott, S. Learning in engineering: Teacher as researcher in a tertiary context. Research in Science Education 30, 317–337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461637
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461637