Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiating the curriculum through the use of problem solving

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a report of the approaches of two classroom science teachers, supported by a research group, to understanding the consequences of a classroom change implemented in response to a perceived problem. The deficiencies of the normal curriculum in providing for the needs of all students became the focus for the teachers of curriculum development in Year 7. This resulted in the design of activities that required students to consolidate and apply their knowledge to the changes in state of water. The challenge was to create accessible yet demanding problem-solving tasks for all students. In this article, the focus is on the consequences of using these tasks. Student interviews were conducted through the period of using the tasks, students made written comments at the end of the sequence, and records were kept of relevant classroom observations. Our concern that students would recognise that the tasks were graded in difficulty, and hence their own ability as science students determined, proved groundless. There were some interesting yet unexpected outcomes, particularly for student learning about aspects of the ways science proceeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, J. R., & Mitchell, I. J. (Eds.).(1986).Improving the quality of teaching and learning. Melbourne: Monash University Printing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R., (Eds.).(1992).Learning From the PEEL Experience. Melbourne: Monash University Printing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.).(1985).Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (Eds.).(1994).The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, C. K. (1987).The science framework P-10. Melbourne: Ministry of Education, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruff, E., & Clarkson, P. (1988).The technology studies framework P-10. Melbourne: Ministry of Education, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (Eds.).(1985).Learning in science. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unstead, R. J., & Henderson, W. F. (1971).Pioneer home life in Australia. London: A. & C. Black.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Mitchell.

Additional information

Anne Symons deceased in 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odgers, S., Symons, A. & Mitchell, I. Differentiating the curriculum through the use of problem solving. Research in Science Education 30, 289–300 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461635

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461635

Keywords

Navigation