Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning deeply in science: An analysis and reintegration of deep approaches in two case studies of grade 8 students

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to articulate in fine detail, the kinds of learning strategies associated with a deep approach to learning science. The interactions of two groups of Grade 8 students were taped while they were engaged in hands-on science activities during instruction in a chemistry unit. The students were also interviewed both before and after instruction to find out more about their understanding of the science concepts in this unit. The focus in this paper is on case studies of two students who showed a deep approach to learning. Analysis of transcipts produced several categories which were used to classify the different strategies used by the students. Examples illustrating the use of these strategies are provided. A model illustrating how a learner's use of strategies is translated into regulatory control of the learning process is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey, P. (1997). It all depends on the context, doesn't it? Searching for general, educable dragons.Studies in Science Education, 29, 45–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R., & White, R. T. (1982). A case study of learning styles in biology.European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1987).Student approaches to learning and studying, Melbourne: Australian council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1988). Approaches to learning and to essay writing. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.),Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 185–228). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1991). Student learning in the context of school. In J. Biggs (Ed.),Teaching for learning (pp. 7–29). Hawthorn: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1994). Approaches to learning: Nature and measurement of. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.),The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 319–322). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Task factors, teacher behaviour, and students' involvement and use of learning strategies in science.The Elementary School Journal, 88, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992).Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • BouJaoude, S. B. (1992). The relationship between students' learning strategies and the change in their misunderstandings during a high school chemistry course.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 689–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A. M. N., & Schafer, L. E. (1994). Relationships between studients' meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetics topics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 393–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding.Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explantation,Journal of the Learning Sciences 1(1), 69–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science education.Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall'Alba, G., & Northfield, J. (1984). Learning strategies of one student on a range of classroom tasks.Research in Science Education, 14, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. P. (1994).Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1981).Styles of learning and teaching. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983).Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualtitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993).Protocol analysis (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective.Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.),Metacognition, motivations and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967).The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (1995). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion.Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 401–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty-Hazel, E., & Prosser, M. (1991a). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies (Part I): Student learning in physics.International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty-Hazel, E., & Prosser, M. (1991b). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies (Part 2): Student learning in biology.International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F., & Idol, L. (Eds.). (1990).Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in middle school science classrooms.American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 586–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Fradd, S. H. & Sutman, F. X. (1995). Science knowledge and cognitive strategy use among culturally and linguistically diverse students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 797–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, R. F. (1975). What does it take to learn? In N. Entwistle, & D. Hounsell (Eds.),How students learn. Lacaster, UK: IRDPCE, University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1983). Beyound individual differences.Educational Psychology, 3, 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1988). Describing and improving learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.),Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 53–81). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I—Outcome and process.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Motivation and studying in high school science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996).Explaining science in the classroom. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change.Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1988). Context and strategy: Situational influences on learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.),Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 159–184). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath, A., & Brown, D. E. (1996). Modes of engagement in science inquiry: A microanalysis of elementary students' orientations toward phenomena at a science summer camp.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1083–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children.Cognition and instruction, 9(3), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R. (1988). An introduction to strategies and styles of learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.),Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 53–81). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983).The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995).The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, M. S., Brown, D. E., & Clement, J. (1990). Genius is not immune to persistent misconceptions: Conceptual difficulties impeding Isaac Newton and contemporary physics students.International Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. F. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanyang Technological University, National Institute of Education, 479 Bukit Timah Road, 259756, Singapore

    Christine Chin

  2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Ilinois, USA

    David E. Brown

Authors
  1. Christine Chin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David E. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chin, C., Brown, D.E. Learning deeply in science: An analysis and reintegration of deep approaches in two case studies of grade 8 students. Research in Science Education 30, 173–197 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461627

Keywords

Search

Navigation