Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study of students' and their teacher's perceptions of laboratory work in secondary schools

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports on a study of student and teacher perceptions of the purpose and effectiveness of laboratory work in science at the Year 10 level of secondary school. The main focus of the study was a comparison between the perceptions of one class of students and their teacher at each of six different schools with regard to the aims, regularity, conduct and assessment of laboratory work. The study identified a number of areas of mismatch between students and their teachers. The findings of the study will be of use to teachers in developing and improving their science curriculum, particularly with regard to laboratory work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Education Council. (1994).Science: A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies. (1995).Curriculum and standards framework: Science. Carlton, Victoria: Board of Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Dunn, J., & Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986).Teaching in laboratories. Guildford: SRHE & NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. P., & Lederman, N. G. (1994). The effect of levels of cooperation with physical science laboratory groups on physical science achievement.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (1995). The place of investigation in practical work in the UK National Curriculum for Science.International Journal of Science Education, 17(20), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V., & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 dtudents' perceptions of and attitudes towards science teaching and school science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (1981). Can the laboratory become the real place of learning?Lab Talk, 25(1), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P., & Gauld, C. (1990). Labwork and students' attitudes. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.),The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 132–156). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, P. J., & O'Loughlin, M. O. (1989). Using practical tests to assess laboratory work in chemistry.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 35(4), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (1976).Statistics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty-Hazel, E. (Ed.). (1990).The student laboratory and the science curriculum. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1988). Experiments in science and science teaching.Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2, 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1992). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science.Studies in Science Education, 22, 85–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Giddings, G. (1981). Evaluating science laboratory skills.The Science Teacher, 48, 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P. P., & Ndyetabura, V. L. (1982). The purpose of practical work: An examination of the aims of teachers and the perceived influence of practical work according to students in Tasmanian high schools and matriculation colleges.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 28(2), 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndyetabura, V. L. (1982).The purpose and assessment of practical work in school science. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1995, July).High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australiasian Science Education Research Association, Bendigo, Victoria.

  • Tamir, P. (1989). Training teachers to teach effectively in the laboratory.Science Education, 73, 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. W. (1996).The purpose and perceived effectiveness of laboratory work in secondary school science. Unpublished Master's thesis, LaTrobe University-Bendigo, Bendigo, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, B. (Ed.). (1991).Practical science. Milton Keyes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, B. E., & Allsop, T. (1985).Practical work in science. Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, La Trobe University, 3550, Bendigo, Victoria

    John Wilkinson & Malcolm Ward

Authors
  1. John Wilkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Malcolm Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkinson, J., Ward, M. A comparative study of students' and their teacher's perceptions of laboratory work in secondary schools. Research in Science Education 27, 599–610 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461483

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461483

Keywords

Search

Navigation